Memorial Hospital of Boscobel
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 390845590
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Boscobel, WI, USA
- Phone
- 6083754112
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $38,693,047
- Expenses
- $35,584,209
- Assets
- $50,638,732
- Liabilities
- $8,880,129
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANDREW NAHAS (BOARD OF DIRECTORS, VICE PRESIDENT, OD)
- JERRY BERGE (BOARD OF DIRECTORS, PRESIDENT)
- KRISTER MATTSON (BOARD OF DIRECTORS, VICE PRESIDENT, ENTERPRISE ANALYTICS AND DATA SCIENCE, (END 9.30.25))
- SCOTT RATHGABER MD (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- SCOTT RATHGABER MD (CEO): $1,397,550 total reported compensation
- JOHN CEELEN (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $782,368 total reported compensation
- KIMBERLY HARDY MD (BOD, MD (BEG 1.1.25 & END 9.30.25)): $454,473 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Leading with love, we courageously commit to a future of healthy people and thriving communities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Gundersen boscobel area hospital and clinics ("the organization") provides inpatient, outpatient, emergency health care services and other financial support through various programs that are designed, among other matters, to enhance the health of the community including the health of low-income patients. Services provided to patients include colonoscopies, laparoscopic surgeries, and knee replacements, among others. The organization is affiliated with gundersen health system. This affiliation provides local services in cardiology, neurology, podiatry, dermatology, urology, and vascular medicine as well as many other services. Consistent with the mission of the organization, care is provided to patients regardless of their ability to pay, including providing services to those persons who are either underinsured or who cannot afford health insurance because of inadequate resources. Health care services to patients under government programs, such as the medicaid program, are also considered part of the organization's benefit provided to the community, since a substantial portion of such services are reimbursed at amounts less than the costs of providing care. (see additional information regarding the cost of providing services to medicaid patients in schedule h of the form 990.) patients who meet certain criteria for charity care, generally based on federal poverty guidelines, are provided care at a significantly reduced rate, determined based on qualifying criteria as defined in the organization's charity care policy and form applications completed by patients and their families. (see additional information regarding the cost of providing services to charity care recipients in schedule h of the form 990.) benefits for serving the community also include unpaid costs of treating the elderly, health screenings, community education through seminars and classes, and other health-related services. During fy25, there were 326 medical/surgical inpatient days, 1,435 swing bed days, 3,731 emergency room visits, and 431 surgical outpatient visits.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 97% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 72
- Accountability: 66
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.7%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 80.4%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 57.1%; rating input score 57; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.42; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.4%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.7% of revenue deployed · 80.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $28.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.4M · 22 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.3M reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 31 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 57/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.