Thhs Oakland (F/k/a Cranbrook Hospice Care)

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
383320699
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2020
Location
Livonia, MI, USA
Phone
7343436570
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Hospices

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$0
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

17 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARK MCPHERSON (DIR; PRES & CEO AT 11/20; TREASURER)
  • PATRICK BROWN (VICE PRESIDENT, FINANCE)

Highest reported compensation

  • ERIN DENHOLM (FORMER OFFICER): $928,508 total reported compensation
  • JOHN CAPASSO (DIRECTOR; TRINITY EVP CONT CARE): $822,435 total reported compensation
  • MARK MCPHERSON (DIR; PRES & CEO AT 11/20; TREASURER): $425,113 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We, trinity home health services and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. Thhs oakland is a member of trinity home health services and trinity health.

What it reported doing in 2020

Thhs oakland ceased operations at the end of fiscal year 2017 and is in the process of winding down. Thhs oakland served hospice patients in the greater southeastern Michigan area since 1997. The patients were cared for by an interdisciplinary team of hospice professionals, ranging from hospice physicians and nurse practitioners to social workers and spiritual care providers. Together, these team members collaborated to provide the best possible hospice care. In addition, thhs oakland provided the patient's family and loved ones with the support they needed, including grief and bereavement programs.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 61
  • Accountability: 81
  • Sustainability: NotEnoughData
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -35.5% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -15.9% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -20.3% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 10 of 12 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $929K · 17 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 10 of 11 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay and related organizations
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2009 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 300 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Series filing activity did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.