The Riverwoods Company at Exeter New Hampshire
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 020400703
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Exeter, NH, USA
- Phone
- 6036581786
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Supportive Housing for Older Adults
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $56,345,679
- Expenses
- $54,112,611
- Assets
- $217,805,115
- Liabilities
- $296,397,069
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JUSTINE VOGEL (CEO)
- JULIE CLARK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- TRACY JEFFERS (ASSOCIATE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JUSTINE VOGEL (CEO): $548,637 total reported compensation
- KIMBERLY GASKELL (VP OF OPERATIONS): $297,328 total reported compensation
- JULIE CLARK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $233,785 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To establish, own, and maintain charitable continuing care retirement communities (ccrc) which provide housing, health care services, food services, security, and other ancillary services to elderly persons.
What it reported doing in 2024
The riverwoods company at exeter nh (rwe) has one primary program service, to establish, manage, and maintain a continuing care retirement community (ccrc) which provides housing, health care services, food services, security, and other ancillary services to older adults over age 62. On june 30, 2025, the community housed approximately 506 residents in independent apartments and 107 residents in health care centers. Over the course of the year the health care centers served approximately 168 residents on a permanent, temporary or per diem basis at a substantially discounted rate. The "contractual allowance" (i.e. Write-off) related to the level of care provided for lifecare contract residents was $14,256,993 for fy25. Continued on schedule o. As a not-for-profit ccrc, rwe has a benevolence fund to help residents who have outlived their assets or have found themselves unable to make their financial commitment, through no fault of their own. If needed, a resident can turn to the riverwoods benevolence fund, rather than placing financial burden on senior assistance programs outside the riverwoods community. In fy25, rwe did not have residents requiring this assistance.rwe was founded in 1983 as a not-for-profit charitable organization, by a grassroots group of seacoast area residents whose mission was to create an active and engaging continuing care community that enhanced the freedom of senior living while easing the challenges of aging. Woven into the fabric of our founding principles is a commitment to the local community: "to be a responsible community that participates in the life of the larger community around it." we consider ourselves neighbors of the local community, and we are dedicated to serving the New Hampshire seacoast area both with our time, knowledge, and through our resources. In fy25, both staff and residents found many ways to give back, serve others, and support the local community by volunteering their time on local not-for-profit boards, volunteering hours in their community, collecting physical donations for toy and food drives and making knitted items to donate to local organizations. Rwe encourages employees to volunteer during work hours for special not-for-profit projects. Part of our mission is not only to help improve the experience of aging for as many adults as possible, but also to share that knowledge with others, especially the younger generation. Employees regularly share their knowledge by inviting students into the rwe community who can learn from the vast knowledge and experience of the staff. Over the years we have hosted students from a variety of schools and provided internships in a variety of coursework, from marketing to finance to social work and health care. Since riverwoods opened its doors in 1994, a key objective has not only been to share our experiences with others, but to learn from others in the industry at the same time. In this way we continue to innovate, to remain at the forefront of new trends in our industry, and to respond to changing consumer preferences, while also advancing the senior living industry as a whole. Our leaders regularly attend industry seminars, participate in study groups, and present on national and internaltional panels within our industry, as well as draft articles for leading publications. Rwe is a strong community partner and in addition to resident and staff time spent volunteering, rwe has helped a number of community-wide events and organizations with financial support. Rwe has also provided small honorariums/donations to a number of groups who have provided speakers for our on-campus education programs.education is a value highly prized by rwe residents. Eighteen years ago, residents established scholarship funds for staff and their families. Since then, 204 scholarships have been distributed, worth more than $592,500 toward goals of higher education. In fy25, $95,000 was awarded to 17 recipients.in july of 2016, a group of rwe employees crea
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 84% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 92
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.6%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 78%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.03; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.36; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.1%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.6% of revenue deployed · 78% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 17 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $42.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $549K · 24 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $7.2M reported
- Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 54/100.