The New Milford Hospital Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
060669121
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2013
Forms available
Form 990 2013
Location
New Milford, CT, USA
Phone
2037398110
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospital, General

Reported finances

Revenue
$64,297,750
Expenses
$64,825,911
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • John M Murphy MD (WCHN Pres & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • John M Murphy MD (WCHN Pres & CEO): $1,298,348 total reported compensation
  • DDeBarba from 1114 (Exec VP & Pres.): $1,136,480 total reported compensation
  • Steven H Rosenberg (SVP/CFO & Treas): $763,050 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide outstanding healthcare to the New Milford and surrounding communities we serve through an uncompromising focus on clinical quality, compassionate care, and the creation of a medical "safe haven" for our patients and their families.

What it reported doing in 2013

During 2014, New Milford Hospital has experienced meaningful change, delivered life-changing experiences, confronted serious issues and achieved significant progress. We are proud of the remarkable progress we have made during a challenging and ultimately rewarding year.As we continue to chart a new path to the future of healthcare we focus on the real results that people and investments can create. The best healthcare comes from combining top medical care with a personal touch provided by our team of dedicated professionals. Thats how we improve the health of our communities, one person at a time.We view 2014 as a year of progress on many fronts. We are expanding cancer care, women's health and emergency services. We have integrated laboratory and radiology services to offer more access and improve efficiency. Professional cooperation between our physicians, support staff and hospitals has never been stronger. Accountable Care is a delivery concept that ties provider reimbursements to specific quality measures, patient satisfaction, efficiencies and reductions in the total cost of care for a particular population of patients. An Accountable Care Organization (ACO) is designed to reward improvements in healthcare quality by sharing the savings that result from a more comprehensive continuum of care that yields better patient outcomes at every level of intervention. At the same time, a hospital that fails to meet minimum measures is put on notice that they will eventually be penalized with reduced reimbursements if they do not improve in a number of areas.A sampling of our recent awards, accolades and acheivements are as follows: Gold Award Plow to Plate Quality Initiative, 2012--CT Quality Improvement Assoc. Plow to Plate Recognition in Community Connections,2012--American Hospital Assoc. Commission on Cancer 3 Year Accreditation with Commendation,2009-2011--Commission on Cancer Regional Cancer Center Accreditation in Radiation Oncology,2011-2013--American College of Radiology Regional Cancer Center Accreditation as a Breast Center,2012--National Accreditation Program for Breast CentersIn late 2011, the establishment of ACOs became an important feature of the Affordable Care Act when the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a set of guidelines for healthcare providers like New Milford Hospital. To address the overall goal to improve healthcare quality, CMS specifies five domains by which they and provider participants can monitor performance quality: -Patient/caregiver experience-Care coordination-Patient safety-Preventive health-Care of at-risk populations including the frail elderlyIn 2014, New Milford Hospital acted to meet and, where possible, exceed these goals. New Milford Hospital strives every day to protect and promote the health and wellness of each of our patients and to provide access to the highest quality care, regardless of their ability to pay. Whether it is through creative prevention partnerships, the management of chronic illness, or connecting patients to appropriate community services, we are devoted to serving our neighbors in need. We are especially vigilant now during these difficult economic times, focusing on disparities in care, older adult health needs, substance abuse and mental health and improving awareness of existing health services and supports. Moreover, we must pursue outreach programs that address such major health issues as heart disease and cancer. Some of our most effective health and wellness initiatives are offering a stable safety net of medical care and support services for our most vulnerable and at-risk neighbors living with serious mental health and substance abuse issues. Achievements of 2014 show a new picture emerging: a coordinated and strong health care partner that preserves the caring spirit of a community hospital with a contemporary operation that reflects the best of modern healthcare. As we approach the opportunities of 2015, we will continue to inves

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 71
  • Accountability: 87
  • Sustainability: 14
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 87%; rating input score 87
  • Program expense ratio: 86.3%; rating input score 86
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 77.8%; rating input score 78; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.8%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.4%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -10.2% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -27.6% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 87% of revenue deployed · 86.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $56M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.3M · 20 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.1M reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2009 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 21 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 43/100.