The H B Playwrights Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 131999454
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2126752370
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Theater
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $43,488
- Expenses
- $117,186
- Assets
- $1,638,372
- Liabilities
- $3,982
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARIE-LOUISE SILVA STEGALL (PRESIDENT)
- JESSICA DOUIEB (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- EDITH MEEKS TO 22025 (EXECUTIVE/ ARTISTIC DIRECTOR): $86,484 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The h b playwrights foundation, inc. Supports the mission of the herbert berghof studio, inc. By operating a theater space that serves as the physical performance outlet for the studio's students and community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Developing and producing new plays and work-in-progress: the hb playwrights foundation is a not-for-profit theater, in collaboration with hb studio, committed to developing and producing new plays and playwrights and to the performance of non-commercial theater for the benefit of the artists involved. During an ordinary year, hbpf will produce works-in-progress productions in collaboration with hb studio. In the fiscal year ending 8/31/2025, hbpf supported 23 public events in its hb playwrights theatre and provided rental space to 8 artistic projects.(continued on schedule o)(a)residency projects: hb studio's residency program provides space for artists to rehearse and present new work at an early-to mid-stage of development with the production capability of the hb playwrights theatre. Six(6) week-long residencies, featuring 54 artists, culminated in public presentations. Residency projects included: sons of an unknown father (2/3/25-2/9/25); pyrrah, the poet, and planet earth (3/31/25-4/6/25); divergentes: que harias por amor?(6/9/25-6/15/25); my body says no (6/23/25-6/29/25); waiting: a queer black tragicomedy in two acts (7/7/25-7/13/25); and lucha libre (7/21/25-7/27/25). Hb also hosted acting out and conch shell productions. Acting out is a resident company of formerly incarcerated persons that presented the odets project (1/18/25- 1/19/25), an acting out book event (5/4/25), and rich: songs of love and outrage (8/3/25). Conch shell productions is a resident company supporting emerging voices of the caribbean diaspora and the caribbean theatre and film scene and presented its new works festival (12/6/24-12/7/24). Hb also hosted spiderwoman theater, the oldest continually running indigenous feminist theater company in the americas, which presented a storyweaving workshop performance (5/16/25-5/17/25), and basement theatrics, an emerging theatre collective dedicated to the development of new work through readings, workshops, productions, and artist-centered community programming. These residency projects and hosted companies engaged 137 artists, presented 17 public performances and presentations, and served an audience of 714.(i)hb studio works-in-progress productions and public events: hb hosted eight(8) staged readings of new full-length plays and established works in development presented in the hb playwrights theatre and the helen gallagher studio theatre, featuring 56 artists, to a total audience of 197. Readings featured: velvet rage: a queer-ass play (4/12/25), rhinoceros (4/19/25), implicit memory systems: a jungian farce (4/26/25), bhai bhai bhai (5/11/25), accidental death of an anarchist (5/17/25), the auditioneers (5/18/25), exit the king (5/31/25), and stay calm (6/7/25).(ii)moderated public talks: public conversations with artists about contemporary theater concerns. Four(4) public talks were held in fy25, featuring 22 artists and serving an audience of 106 topics included: a conversation with max casella and michael beckett (3/9/25); crowdfunding for creatives: turning community into capital with zaq latino (5/3/25); the international student roundtable (5/24/25); and a conversation (hb insight series): the testimony project, pt.1: theatre as a witness to our times with frank wood & emily adler; the testimony project, pt2: noel coward's legacy at hb studio with alan pally & frank wood; and the testimony project, pt.3 with tina satter & frank wood.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 75.8%; rating input score 76
- Fundraising efficiency: $0 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -169.5%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 13.98; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 27.5%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.6% per year; rating input score 0; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.3% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 75.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $89K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $86K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 4/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.