The Auxiliary of St Joseph's Hospital Health Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 203018640
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Syracuse, NY, USA
- Phone
- 3154486100
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $165,960
- Expenses
- $193,069
- Assets
- $253,344
- Liabilities
- $181,964
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LORETTA QUIGLEY (DIRECTOR; PRESIDENT; CONSULTANT)
- JOANNA FERGUSON (DIRECTOR; IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
- SUZANNE KONDRA (DIRECTOR; VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- VINCENT KUSS (DIRECTOR; VP FOUNDATION): $330,325 total reported compensation
- LORETTA QUIGLEY (DIRECTOR; PRESIDENT; CONSULTANT): $5,343 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We, the auxiliary of st. Joseph's hospital health center and st. Joseph's health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.the auxiliary of st. Joseph's hospital health center is a member of st. Joseph's health and trinity health.
What it reported doing in 2024
The auxiliary was created in 1888 to support st. Joseph's hospital health center (the hospital) and provide services to its patients.the auxiliary organizes, coordinates, conducts and participates in activities which benefit the hospital and its patients, as well as soliciting and encouraging community financial support for the hospital. In addition, the auxiliary assists in the recruitment and training of community volunteers to serve the needs of the hospital and its patients.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 79% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 94% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 83
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 99.4%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 86.7%; rating input score 87; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -16.3%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.31; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.72; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 25.6%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.6% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 99.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 15 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $192K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $330K · 15 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 309 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.