Stanford Health Care

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
941429628
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Pleasanton, CA, USA
Phone
650-498-3333
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Hospitals and Related Primary Medical Care Facilities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$614,260,086
Expenses
$598,022,642
Assets
$502,692,148
Liabilities
$162,807,292

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

33 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MISTY JONES (PRESIDENT/CEO (AS OF 06/25))

Highest reported compensation

  • DAVID ENTWISTLE (DIRECTOR): $5,385,633 total reported compensation
  • QUINN MCKENNA (DIRECTOR (UNTIL 01/25)): $2,589,728 total reported compensation
  • LINDA HOFF (DIRECTOR): $2,449,978 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To integrate groundbreaking research, stellar scholarship, and standard-setting clinical care.

What it reported doing in 2024

Shc tri-valley's operational services include inpatient medical, surgical and maternal & child health, emergency, diagnostic and therapeutic, ambulatory procedural and additional health care services. Care is provided to all including those insured by government, commercial or occupational health coverages, self-pay patients and patients who meet certain criteria under the charity-care policy without charge or at amounts less than established rates. Any profits made from operations are invested into new facilities, equipment and services or community benefit programs. Stanford health care tri-valley's annual community benefit investment focuses on improving the health of the community's most vulnerable populations, including the medically underserved, low-income, and populations affected by health disparities. At the core of this work is a commitment to addressing the social determinants of health and breaking down barriers that affect well-being and opportunity, including housing, economic security, and social support. To address these needs, shc tri-valley partners with local community-based organizations and government agencies to support programs that improve the health of the community, working together to address the various needs of community members. Shc tri-valley's community engagement efforts also include community building, workforce development, advocacy, and health education and prevention. By supporting and advancing positive change, we work to promote health equity now and for future generations. Activities for vulnerable populations shc tri-valley sponsored a one-day event with alameda county veterans stand down to support homeless or at-risk veterans by providing the necessary social and human services to help them improve their lives. In addition to snacks and lunch, resources for veterans, including physical and mental health care, dental checkups, haircuts, and much more were offered at this event. Shc tri-valley supported cape's provision of meals for preschool-aged children by preparing all the meals. Cape, inc.'s primary focus is providing the highest quality early childhood development services that meet the needs of low-income children and their families including health and nutrition. Served over 150 preschoolers. Provided funding to support operation cranberry sauce (ocs). Ocs food packages feed a family of five for a thanksgiving meal. Each low-income family received one box of groceries that included staples and nonperishable items and a frozen turkey. Food packages were provided to approximately 9,000 low-income family members in livermore, pleasanton, dublin, san leandro, castro valley, hayward, and oakland. Persons served: approx. 9,000 donated surplus meals & food supplies to daily bowl. Daily bowl then delivers that surplus food which would otherwise go to waste, distributing it to local agencies feeding people who are hungry. Over 2,000 lbs. Of food donated. Provided experts to assist uninsured, low-income patients research their health care options. Services provided at no cost by meddata involve helping individuals research eligibility requirements, identify appropriate health insurance programs, complete applications, compile required documentation, and follow up with county case managers. This service assists eligible patients in obtaining coverage for medical necessities, such as hospital care, prescription drugs, and home health care. Provided funding and resources for patients that have limited or no ability to pay for necessary medical and nonmedical services through the social work and case management department. Services include transportation, medications, clothing, and meal assistance. Persons served: 1,230 shc tri-valley provided funds for a licensed marriage and family therapist (mft) for axis community health. This therapist increased capacity to serve tri-valley residents at axis' clinical site. The additional counselor has helped to alleviate the dire need for more mental he

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Accountability: 65
  • Sustainability: 45
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 88.9%; rating input score 89
  • Program expense ratio: 91.4%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.17 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 84.6%; rating input score 85; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 83.8%; rating input score 84; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 40%; rating input score 40; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.6%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.84; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.32; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.6%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 4 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 88.9% of revenue deployed · 91.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $546.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $5.4M · 33 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $17.8M reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 33 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 23 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 73 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 40/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 22/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 53/100.