Stanford Medicine Children's Health

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
320359189
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Palo Alto, CA, USA
Phone
6504978000
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health Treatment Facilities, Primarily Outpatient

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$166,932,166
Expenses
$162,823,714
Assets
$47,427,154
Liabilities
$32,689,990

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

23 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PATRICK IDEMOTO (FORMER INTERIM CEO)
  • CHANTAL VOLEL-TORRES (DIRECTOR AND CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • PATRICK IDEMOTO (FORMER INTERIM CEO): $1,410,203 total reported compensation
  • DANA HAERING (EVP & CFO): $1,207,004 total reported compensation
  • TIM CORNELL MD (Director): $820,219 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To care, to educate, to discover.

What it reported doing in 2024

Program service description during the period of september 2024 through august 2025 (fy 2025), pcha primarily focused on operations and existing provider visit growth. In addition, we continue to increase our availability at many of our sites by increasing the number of providers. This year we continued to improve services offered via our patient portal including directly scheduling appointments, requesting prescriptions, viewing billing statements and communicating with medical providers. The three largest services pcha operated in fiscal year 2025 were: general pediatrics - bayside general pediatrics - peninsula pediatrics general pediatrics - pediatric associates bayside bayside medical group is dedicated to providing the highest-quality care to our patients. We specialize in the care of children from birth to the late teen years. Our team of clinicians and specially trained medical office staff have earned a reputation for excellence, serving generations of families in the bay area. Our care team members are certified by the american board of pediatrics. Our pediatricians specialize in the care of newborns, children and adolescents at all 10 of our offices. Stanford medicine children's health - pediatrics stanford medicine children's health - pediatrics (formerly peninsula pediatric medical group) in menlo park has been dedicated to providing the highest-quality care to our patients for over 20 years. We specialize in the care of children from birth to the late teen years. Our team of pediatricians and specially trained medical office staff have earned a reputation for excellence, serving generations of families in the bay area. All of our pediatricians are certified by the american board of pediatrics pediatric associates medical group pediatric associates is dedicated to providing the best in pediatric care to families throughout santa clara county. All of our pediatricians are board certified and members of the american academy of pediatrics, and are on staff at good samaritan hospital in san jose. We are here to help guide you with your children's health care needs and believe in working with you to ensure that your children maintain optimal health as they grow and develop. Technology in health care management, our many years of pediatric expertise, and our compassion for your family's health care needs make pediatric associates the best choice for your family. Patient visits provided in the fiscal year 2025 for each of the largest services are: bayside: 80,910 peninsula pediatrics: 46,586 pediatric associates: 25,090

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has grown recently. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 59
  • Accountability: 59
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 88.8%; rating input score 89
  • Program expense ratio: 91.1%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 37.5%; rating input score 38; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.5%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.29; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.69; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.8%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 88.8% of revenue deployed · 91.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 8 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $148.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.4M · 23 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $76.3M reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 66 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 38/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 41/100.