St Vincent Depaul Society District Council of Dayton Ohio Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 311011485
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2008
- Location
- Dayton, OH, USA
- Phone
- 9372227349
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $7,853,107
- Expenses
- $6,740,800
- Assets
- $21,329,989
- Liabilities
- $4,716,536
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
34 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BONNIE VITANGELI (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JOHN MALAS (PRESIDENT)
- MICHAEL VANDERBURGH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- MICHAEL VANDERBURGH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $197,687 total reported compensation
- ANGIE GRILLIOT (CHIEF OF STAFF): $163,057 total reported compensation
- CHRISTINE HAMPTON (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $146,372 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The vision of st. Vincent de paul society in dayton is to improve the lives of people in need in the miami valley. Our mission is to, with christian purpose, accompany those in need one person at a time by focusing on shelter, food, and clothing. Our core values are unconditional service, hospitality, stewardship, and gratitude.
What it reported doing in 2024
Conferences - affiliated with 28 parishes and 1 university, in the greater dayton area, st. Vincent de paul conferences provide person-to-person assistance to impoverished members of the community. Conference members visit those in need in their homes, offering direct assistance in many forms, such as groceries, utility payments, rent or mortgage assistance, prescriptions, or simply listening with compassion and offering prayers.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 68% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 58% for direct work, 42% for grants, and 0% for affiliated organizations.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 57
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 61.2%; rating input score 61
- Program expense ratio: 67%; rating input score 67
- Fundraising efficiency: $2.7 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.8%; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14.2%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.16; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.1%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 61.2% of revenue deployed · 67% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 30 of 30 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $4.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $198K · 34 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 7/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.