St Vincent De Paul Social Services Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311132259
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Dayton, OH, USA
Phone
9372227349
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Homeless Centers
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,402,798
Expenses
$10,164,030
Assets
$13,123,176
Liabilities
$617,222

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ALLAN CRASTO (COMMUNITY BOARD PRESIDENT)
  • MICHAEL VANDERBURGH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • MICHAEL VANDERBURGH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $197,687 total reported compensation
  • ANGIE GRILLIOT (CHIEF OF STAFF): $163,057 total reported compensation
  • CHRISTINE HAMPTON (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $146,372 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The vision of st. Vincent de paul society in dayton is to improve the lives of people in need in the miami valley. Our mission is to, with christian purpose, accompany those in need one person at a time by focusing on shelter, food, and clothing. Our core values are unconditional service, hospitality, stewardship, and gratitude.

What it reported doing in 2024

Permanent housing - many of the people served by st. Vincent de paul face a greater number of challenges and need long-term support to achieve and maintain housing stability. Our 3 permanent supportive housing programs serve homeless men, women, and families who have significant disabilities, primarily mental health. Kettering commons serves 25 homeless households comprised of single men, single women and families in which the head of household has been diagnosed with at least one disability. The st. Vincent depaul center serves 39 homeless single men all of whom have at least one diagnosed mental health disability. Safe haven serves 13 single homeless men and women who have severe and persistent mental illness and who cannot or will not link to treatment. Many of the clients we serve in all of our programs have co-occurring disabilities and require long-term supportive services to achieve housing, life skills, and employment goals.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 66% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 92% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 77
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 97.7%; rating input score 98
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.3%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.29; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.2%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 97.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $10.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $198K · 11 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.