St Luke Services Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 815232014
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Oswego, NY, USA
- Phone
- 3153423166
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Management & Technical Assistance
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,788,294
- Expenses
- $2,793,664
- Assets
- $1,829,460
- Liabilities
- $1,599,000
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEROME MIRABITO (PRESIDENT)
- MICHAEL POLLACK (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- BRIAN CASWELL (MEMBER)
- JEROME MIRABITO (PRESIDENT)
- STEPHEN FRAWLEY (MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The charitable purpose for which the corporation is formed is to relieve the poor and distressed and to advance the health and social well-being of elderly, disabled, underpriviledged and otherwise needy persons living in oswego New York and its surrounding communities by advising and assisting in the planning and coordination of the activities and functions of: (a) st. Luke residential health care facility, inc.;(b)bishop's commons, inc.; (c) st. Francis commons, inc.; (d) the st. Luke john foster burden corporation; and (e) such other nonprofit organizations recognized under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code of 1986, as amended, as may hereafter be affiliated with the above not-for-profit corporations.
What it reported doing in 2024
Health information management performs medical records functions for st. Luke residential health care facility, bishop's commons, and st. Francis commons.administration provides direction to each of the entities by advising, and assisting the planning and coordination of day to day activities. Community relations seeks out how to better serve the population of the elderly, disabled and underprivileged. Uses census and statistic information to help formulate plans to advance the health and social well-being of the oswego population.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 50
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 80
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 56.2%; rating input score 56
- Program expense ratio: 56.1%; rating input score 56
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.2%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.65; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.87; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 30.3% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 56.2% of revenue deployed · 56.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 56/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.