St Luke Residential Health Care Facility Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
161391191
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2020
Location
Oswego, NY, USA
Phone
3153423166
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Nursing, Convalescent Facilities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$19,477,560
Expenses
$20,465,861
Assets
$7,786,767
Liabilities
$8,707,786

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JEROME MIRABITO (PRESIDENT)
  • MICHAEL POLLOCK (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • SHARRON GLEN (RN UNIT MANAGER): $114,421 total reported compensation
  • MARGARET BURM (RN SUPERVISOR): $109,381 total reported compensation
  • MELINDA FORD-PRIOR (DIRECTOR OF NURSING): $105,563 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To meet the evolving healthcare needs of our community, st. Luke residential healthcare facility, inc. Is dedicated to helping the people we serve live to their maximum potential and promote dignity of life throughout all of its stages.

What it reported doing in 2024

St. Luke health services is located in oswego, New York, overlooking the scenic oswego river. St. Luke is easily accessible and close to neighbors and friends in the greater-oswego, New York community for over 30 years.our short-stay rehab units offer intensive physical, occupational, or speech therapy lasting generally no more than 90 days for those who are recovering from surgery, or a major medical event such as a stroke or heart attack. St. Luke adult day health care is a daily health monitoring and activities program designed to promote independence and delay institutionalization of the disabled adult, available for 20 registrants throughout oswego county. A medicaid eligible program, adult day health care is a medical model program providing health and medical care, including case management, health assessment, physical rehabilitation, occupational therapy, speech therapy, dental services, therapeutic diets, nutritional education and more.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 83% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 80
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 89%; rating input score 89
  • Program expense ratio: 84.3%; rating input score 84
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5.1%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.38; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.12; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.6%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -6.4% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 89% of revenue deployed · 84.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $17.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $114K · 12 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $331K reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.