St Joseph's Villa

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
540505950
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Richmond, VA, USA
Phone
8045533200
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Residential Care & Adult Day Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$25,987,042
Expenses
$24,837,151
Assets
$30,416,792
Liabilities
$4,464,299

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

23 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JENNIFER FRIAR (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • JENNIFER FRIAR (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $271,555 total reported compensation
  • CYNTHIA FAISON (COO): $213,012 total reported compensation
  • SUZANNE HINTON (CFO/TREASURER): $189,870 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of st. Joseph's villa is to provide children with special needs and their families the opportunity to succeed through effective and innovative programs.

What it reported doing in 2024

Behavioral health services: behavioral health system is comprised of crisis services umbrella of the children's residential crisis stabilization unit (csu) and the youth crisis receiving center (crc). Crisis services. Csu is in partnership with rbha region 4 and is designed to divert the number of hospitalizations of youth ages 5-17 who experience mental health crisis for up to 15-day stays. Crc operates in partnership with henrico county and region 4 designed to provide immediate access to people in mental health crisis with rapid crisis assessment and warm hand-off to essential resources. Admissions to crc are tailored to youth ages 7-17 for various rapid assessments, clinical interventions, and relevant resources for next level of care depending on the level of stabilization. Youth may return home, be referred to on-going treatment such as the csu, or require hospitalization within a 23-hour time frame. Crisis stabilization unit (csu) served 92 unduplicated youth with a total of 95 admissions in fy25 and diverted 96% from hospitalization, with a total of 1,145 bed days. Youth served reside primarily in region 4, consisting of henrico county, city of richmond, chesterfield county, and rising numbers from outside of region 4. A child psychiatrist provided consultations via telehealth with 95 youth and their families and community providers to ensure continuity of care upon discharge. 86% of youth made progress on their goals and objectives; 89% of clients and 93% of parents/guardians reported being fully satisfied with services. End of year goals for csu regarding clients: * participants will increase the number of community-based linkages made to keep the child and family together or to reunite the family. O 80% of participants enrolled in csu * 100% of clients received services for making effective linkages at discharge (70 participants' increase linkages, 24 participants' linkages remained the same) * participants will learn more effective and healthier coping skills o 80% of participants enrolled in csu * 86% of clients learned more effective and healthier coping skills * participants will demonstrate overall satisfaction with the program. O 80% of participants enrolled in csu * 89% of clients were satisfied, 93% of parents/guardians were satisfiedcrisis receiving center (crc) opened april 4, 2024in fy25, the crc served 170 individuals and diverted 87% from hospitalization. Youth and individuals who served primarily reside in henrico, chesterfield, and hanover counties as well as city of richmond. A child psychiatrist provided consultations via telehealth with 97 youth and their families and community providers to ensure continuity of care upon discharge. 100% of clients and 100% of parents/guardians reported being fully satisfied with services. End of year goals for crc regarding clients: * crc will admit 90% of individuals presenting for service who meet criteria and o 100% of clients meeting criteria were admitted for services * all individuals seeking services, regardless of meeting admissions criteria will receive appropriate assessment(s) and community referral(s) o 100% of individuals not meeting criteria received services to appropriate community referrals * stabilize 50% of individuals within 23 hours to divert from inpatient psychiatric hospitalizations o 87% of individuals were diverted from a higher level of care of hospitalization * participants will demonstrate overall satisfaction with the program. O 100% of clients were satisfied, 100% of parents/guardians were satisfied

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 69% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 94% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.1%; rating input score 79
  • Program expense ratio: 82.6%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $11.64 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.4%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.22; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.3%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 79.1% of revenue deployed · 82.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 7 filed program accomplishments · $20.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $272K · 23 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $969K reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 42/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 48/100.