Spectrum Medical Care Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 270389889
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 6026049500
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, Specialty
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $28,555,417
- Expenses
- $27,718,713
- Assets
- $17,206,045
- Liabilities
- $2,291,150
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- AMY SNEOR RN BSN BA (CEO (THROUGH SEPTEMBER 2025))
- MARK MOEREMANS (CEO (AS OF SEPTEMBER 2025))
Highest reported compensation
- AMY SNEOR RN BSN BA (CEO (THROUGH SEPTEMBER 2025)): $347,651 total reported compensation
- JANET KIM MD (PHYSICIAN): $252,358 total reported compensation
- DR HOWARD GROSSMAN (MEDICAL DIRECTOR (AS OF MAY 2025)): $210,650 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission: spectrum medical care center advances the health and well-being of Arizona's lgbtq+ community and those living with HIV by providing premium, personalized care rooted in deep cultural understanding and health equity.our vision: to be the premier destination for lgbtq+ health across the southwest, recognized for clinical excellence, community partnerships, and transformative impact on the health and wellbeing of lgbtq+ adults and those living with HIV across the region.
What it reported doing in 2025
See schedule o
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 76
- Accountability: 81
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.3%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 89.4%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 79.1%; rating input score 79; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.9%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.62; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.1%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 21.3% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 18.2% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.3% of revenue deployed · 89.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 8 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $24.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $348K · 21 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 16 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 42/100.