1N10 Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
860728990
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Phoenix, AZ, USA
Phone
6024002601
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Lesbian, Gay Rights

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,444,371
Expenses
$4,647,017
Assets
$5,110,392
Liabilities
$1,299,242

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

22 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • NATHANIEL RHOTON (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • NATHANIEL RHOTON (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $181,182 total reported compensation
  • KADO STEWART (VP OF PROGRAMS & STRATEGY): $134,756 total reported compensation
  • CLAYTON DAVENPORT (SR. DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT): $120,601 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide support and resources for the local lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and questioning (lgbtq) youth. To provide youth with life and leadership skills and the tools to improve self esteem and acceptance of who they are.

What it reported doing in 2025

Youth center (yc): the youth center is the central hub for all one n ten programs. Located in central phoenix and open 5+ days a week, the yc provides consistent, engaging programming, essential resources, and dedicated support staff for lgbtq+ youth across the valley.each evening offers a different program, creating opportunities for youth to build community, explore their identities, access support, and engage in meaningful conversations with peers and staff in a welcoming, affirming, and safe environment.ongoing and recurring youth center programming includes: teen nights (ages 13-17): dedicated evenings for younger youth to connect in a developmentally appropriate space, build friendships, and engage in age-specific activities and discussions.disability nights: inclusive programming designed to center and support youth with disabilities, creating space for connection, accessibility, and community-building.wellness programs: wellness programming is offered at the youth center and across additional program sites, using a holistic approach that supports mental, emotional, physical, and social well-being.developmentally and age-appropriate sexual health (daash) (formerly sexfyi): a medically accurate, lgbtqia+-centered sexual health education program. Daash creates a safe, inclusive space for youth to ask questions, engage in open discussion, and learn about healthy relationships and sexual health.sources of strength (sos): an evidence-based prevention program that helps youth identify and build on their "sources of strength" protective factors that support resilience and help prevent suicide, bullying, and violence. Sos is offered across multiple programs, including camp outdoors.friends ending stigma together (fest): our HIV/AIDS education and prevention program focused on HIV awareness, peer support, destigmatization, and access to testing. Fest ensures youth have accurate information and a space where they feel safe, seen, and supported.identity-based and affinity programming:2gether n color (2nc): a program for lgbtqia+ youth from diverse cultural and ethnic backgrounds. 2nc provides space to explore identity, build community, and learn about the cultures, histories, and experiences of participants. 2nc presents is open to all identities and explores topics such as intersectionality, culture, and allyship.gender non-conforming (gnc) group: a dedicated space for trans, nonbinary, gender-expansive, and questioning youth to connect, share experiences, and build affirming community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 79% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 66
  • Transparency & Controls: 84
  • Accountability: 96
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 66.5%; rating input score 67
  • Program expense ratio: 77%; rating input score 77
  • Fundraising efficiency: $9.05 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 14.6%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.1; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.25; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.8%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 16.8% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 20.1% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 66.5% of revenue deployed · 77% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 14 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $3.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $181K · 22 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $805K reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 32/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.