Southwest Initiative Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 411555592
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Hutchinson, MN, USA
- Phone
- 3205874848
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Business and Industry
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $14,711,866
- Expenses
- $11,406,039
- Assets
- $123,441,507
- Liabilities
- $9,197,950
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SCOTT MARQUARDT (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- SCOTT MARQUARDT (PRESIDENT): $183,781 total reported compensation
- AMY WOITALEWICZ (BUSINESS FINANCE DIRECTOR): $141,850 total reported compensation
- NANCY FASCHING (VP OF COMMUNITY IMPACT): $140,131 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Southwest initiative foundation's (swif's) original mission was to strengthen southwest Minnesota in three ways: improving the region's economic self-reliance, overcoming human distress, and promoting regional leadership coordination and partnerships. The foundation continues to address these broad areas and serve as a partner through business finance and economic development, grantmaking and community programming, and community giving and philanthropy.the lasting outcome of this work is economic mobility for all people in southwest Minnesota to attain a reasonable standard of living, experience the dignity that comes from having power and autonomy over their lives, and be engaged in and valued by their community.
What it reported doing in 2024
See schedule ocommunity impact: the southwest initiative foundation (swif) provides grants and programs to create opportunities for all people to thrive in our local communities. Our grantmaking, proactive programming and community led belonging activities help create opportunities for all people to thrive in the communities they call home. Through these efforts, we can lead individuals and communities to thrive.swif continues work in growing local: an eight-month training program designed to help up-and-coming leaders discover and build upon their unique strengths so they can make a difference in their communities. This program helps cultivate a vital leadership pipeline in southwest Minnesota by supporting boards, commissions, and committees with leaders who reflect the makeup of their communities. The initial cohort graduated 14 participants, and the second cohort graduated 13.swif supports welcoming week efforts across southwest Minnesota, ranging from 6 to 16 communities. Through this, organizations and communities bring together neighbors of all backgrounds to build strong connections and affirm the importance of welcoming and inclusive places in achieving collective prosperity. Swif provides funding and support for welcoming week celebrations in communities across our region as a part of our membership in welcoming america, the national organization leading welcoming week.swif expanded the welcoming and inclusive communities project to lac qui parle county. This program helps community members build relationships and learn inclusive community practices while growing their local network of "welcomers" who are passionate about including everyone. Communities apply to be part of the project and then participate in monthly cohort meetings to share tools, skills, and strategies for welcoming and inclusion.the team also works to improve community well-being by supporting youth and families and improving mental health resources and awareness. This includes being a partner in the suicide awareness campaigns, and crisis support and response. Swif also serves the regional nonprofits by providing nonprofit technical assistance and training to build capacity and support the organizations' development.grantmaking is at the heart of our role as a community foundation. We accept grant applications on an ongoing basis as well as providing defined grant rounds throughout the year. We also serve as a philanthropic intermediary to bring additional grant dollars into our region through partner foundations.swif is 1 of 23 community foundations across a 10-state network participating in a philanthropic preparedness, resiliency, and emergency partnership. We continue to use the best practices learned through this network in disaster response recovery work within our region as needs arise.swif's paul and alma schwan aging trust endowment fund promotes productive aging in southwest Minnesota. Established in 1991, this is a key example of legacy and impact donors can make through swif. It continues to fund age-friendly community work launched in 2016 in partnership with the Minnesota river area agency on aging and the prairie five community action. This fund also supports a responsive grant fund for community projects that reduce social isolation and loneliness for senior citizens in southwest Minnesota by fostering social connections.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 42% for direct work, and 58% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 66
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 80
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81.7%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 84.2%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $19.09 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 22.5%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.82; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.4%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81.7% of revenue deployed · 84.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $9.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $184K · 11 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $125K reported
- Consistency: 38 of 39 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 171 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 168 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 56/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 40/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.