Somerset Academy Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 311569428
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Miami, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3056692906
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Elementary, Secondary Education, K - 12
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $429,843,272
- Expenses
- $395,085,035
- Assets
- $665,247,185
- Liabilities
- $389,647,431
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BERNARDO MONTERO (PRESIDENT)
- SUZETTE RUIZ (VICE-PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- BERNARDO MONTERO (PRESIDENT): $245,726 total reported compensation
- KERRI ANN O'SULLIVAN (EMPLOYEE): $224,000 total reported compensation
- SUZETTE RUIZ (VICE-PRESIDENT): $210,250 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Established as charter school operator in district school boards of miami-dade, broward county, palm beach county, duval county, st. Lucie county, and Texas state board of education. Somerset academy, inc. Is dedicated to providing equitable, high-quality education for all students, and promotes a culture that maximizes student achievement and fosters the development of accountable, 21st century learners in a safe and enriching environment.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provides education for children from pre-kindergarten through twelfth grade. For the fiscal year ended june 30, 2025 33,000 students were enrolled.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 92% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.4%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 89.2%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.1%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.68; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.59; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.3%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.8% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 24.4% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.4% of revenue deployed · 89.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $352.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $246K · 12 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $216.5M reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.