Somerset Academy Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 464129017
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2015
- Location
- Pembroke Pines, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3056692906
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,310,109
- Expenses
- $2,149,402
- Assets
- $40,247,277
- Liabilities
- $35,851,976
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SUZETTE RUIZ (PRESIDENT,CHAIRMAN, DIRECTOR)
- BERNIE MONTERO (VICE PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- DAVID CONCEPCION (DIRECTOR, SECRETARY)
- SUZETTE RUIZ (PRESIDENT,CHAIRMAN, DIRECTOR)
- BERNIE MONTERO (VICE PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Somerset academy foundation, inc. Serves as a type 1 supporting organization for somerset academy, inc., a section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization that operates charter schools in miami-dade county, Florida.
What it reported doing in 2024
Somerset academy foundation, inc. Is a supporting organization to the operations of somerset academy charter schools and the development of their new school facilities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 92% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 81
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 59.1%; rating input score 59
- Program expense ratio: 98.9%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 35.1%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 18.72; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.89; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 19.8% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 24.3% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 59.1% of revenue deployed · 98.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $426K reported
- Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.