Soles4Souls
Legal name: Soles4souls Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 204023482
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2023
- Location
- Old Hickory, TN, USA
- Phone
- 6153915723
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Emergency Assistance
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $88,258,383
- Expenses
- $86,508,316
- Assets
- $42,818,906
- Liabilities
- $2,954,669
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
31 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- EARNEST TEASTER III (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- EARNEST TEASTER III (PRESIDENT & CEO): $459,753 total reported compensation
- MIKE SHIREY (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $326,768 total reported compensation
- NANCY YOUSSEF (CHIEF BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OFFICER): $323,752 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Soles4Souls turns unwanted shoes and clothing into opportunity.
What it reported doing in 2024
During fy25, soles4souls continued its partnership with street business school. Through this collaboration, our partners trained 86 entrepreneurs in the dominican republic, 58 in haiti, and 8 in the philippines. Additionally, four soles4souls employees, three of whom are women, were certified as trainers.more than 1.25 million children in the united states are experiencing homelessness. Addressing this critical need, soles4souls continues to respond with our 4everykid program, an initiative that provides a pair of new athletic shoes to k-12 students in the united states who are experiencing homelessness. We know that when children have their basic needs met, they feel more confident, can participate in sports, and stay focused on their learning. During fy25, soles4souls distributed 112,648 pairs of shoes and 264,891 pairs of socks to students experiencing homelessness through 270 partners nationwide.a core component of the soles4souls mission is providing relief to people impacted by natural and humanitarian disasters. During fy25, soles4souls provided apparel, footwear and additional accessories to respond to domestic and international relief efforts. Through its robust partner network, soles4souls continued to serve recent arrivals to the u.s., those displaced by natural disasters, and individuals experiencing humanitarian hardships through strong alliances with local, regional and global organizations. In response to soles4souls crises, soles4souls provided donations to trusted partners to distribute within their direct networks. Soles4souls has also remained steadfast in its response efforts in eastern europe to support ukrainian relief efforts. In fy25 alone, soles4souls directly supplied 526,457 pairs of shoes, 461,258 pieces of clothing and 402,516 units of accessories, socks and other items to organizations focused on disaster relief. On average, items were distributed within 6-12 weeks post disaster.through its many distribution programs described above, soles4souls diverted 10,764,538 pairs/pieces from landfills totaling approximately 9,608,465 pounds of product. Since inception, soles4souls has diverted 103,191,885 pairs/pieces from landfills totaling approximately 99,042,253 pounds. Through the soles4souls global experiences program, volunteers from across the united states join soles4souls staff on distribution trips to countries where it has partner microenterprise operations to experience first-hand providing shoes to people in these developing countries. During fy25, soles4souls conducted 23 trips with approximately 195 individuals traveling to honduras, guatemala, dominican republic and the united states.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 74% for direct work, and 26% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 64
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 91.8%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 93.7%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: $23.85 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 85.5%; rating input score 86; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.49; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.9%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 7 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 91.8% of revenue deployed · 93.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $81M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $460K · 31 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $440K reported
- Consistency: 40 of 43 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 74 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 62 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 40/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule M noncash within contributions did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.