Partnership with Children Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 135596751
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2126899500
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $14,729,906
- Expenses
- $14,579,006
- Assets
- $20,097,230
- Liabilities
- $4,246,572
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
36 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- HELENA WILLNER (PRESIDENT)
- JED FINN (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
- DAVID COHEN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ALEXANDRA MURRAY (VICE PRESIDENT)
- RAMNEEK RIKHY (VICE PRESIDENT)
- WESNER PIERRE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- WESNER PIERRE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & CEO): $331,744 total reported compensation
- ANGELA JEFFERSON (CHIEF PROGRAM OFFICER): $198,711 total reported compensation
- RENE FRANKLYN PINTADO (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $196,837 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Partnership with children's mission is to strengthen the emotional, social, and cognitive skills of children in New York city so they can succeed in school, society, and life.
What it reported doing in 2024
Comprehensive school-based mental health services: we placed masters-level clinical social workers into 9 public and charter schools in nyc's most under-resourced communities. Our staff are based full-time in the schools, providing mental health services that include individual and group counseling, classroom interventions, case management, and home visits and are grounded in social-emotional learning (sel), trauma-informed care, and neuroscience. Our programs increase student wellness, attendance, on-task behavior, and achievement levels; improve teachers' classroom management skills and increase their time spent on instruction; reduce violence and suspensions; and engage parents and families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 78% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 80.4%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $16.83 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.38; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.21; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.3%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81% of revenue deployed · 80.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $11.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $332K · 36 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $500K reported
- Consistency: 41 of 41 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 53/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 57/100.