Jasa
Legal name: Services for the Aged Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 133200109
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, US
- Phone
- 212.273.5200
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- In-Home Assistance
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $30,846,844
- Expenses
- $31,235,880
- Assets
- $10,447,371
- Liabilities
- $11,481,074
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
34 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BONNIE D ROSENBERG (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
- DAVID HILDES (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JESSICA FEDER MANTEL (PRESIDENT)
- JOSEPH RUBIN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MARK R IMOWITZ (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MARTIN SIROKA (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- KATHRYN HASLANGER (OUTGOING CEO): $536,369 total reported compensation
- MATTHEW LOCURTO (CFO): $287,816 total reported compensation
- SVETLANA GOYKHBERG (DIRECTOR OF HOMECARE): $202,587 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
JASA champions the dignity, independence, and vitality of older adults.
What it reported doing in 2024
Under a contractual agreement with the city of ny and managed care organizations, the organization provides home attendant services to medicaid-approved clients. In addition, the organization provides home attendant services to private pay clients.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 85.9%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.3%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.33; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.1; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.9%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 13 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 87% of revenue deployed · 85.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 27 of 27 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $26.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $536K · 34 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $420K reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 10 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.