Baylor Scott & White Health
Legal name: Scott & White Hospital-Marble Falls
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 464007700
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Dallas, TX, USA
- Phone
- 1.866.218.6919
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $166,915,770
- Expenses
- $148,879,571
- Assets
- $110,269,713
- Liabilities
- $86,923,418
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
33 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Tim Ols (President/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Lisa L Havens (Secretary): $2,255,081 total reported compensation
- Arundhati Rao MD PhD (Trustee): $1,033,098 total reported compensation
- Angel Caldera MD (Trustee): $933,016 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To serve people by providing high-quality, compassionate healthcare as a Christian ministry.
What it reported doing in 2024
See Schedule OScott & White Hospital - Marble Falls dba Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Marble Falls (BSW Marble Falls) is a faith-based, nonprofit, 46-bed critical access hospital, providing exemplary patient care services to the residents of Burnet County and the surrounding communities since 2015.BSW Marble Falls is affiliated with Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH), a faith-based nationally acclaimed network of acute care hospitals and related health care entities providing quality patient care, medical education, medical research and other community services to the residents of North and Central Texas. As the largest not-for-profit health care system in Texas and one of the largest in the United States, BSWH was born from the 2013 combination of Baylor Health Care System and Scott & White Healthcare. Today, BSWH has over 1,300 patient access points including 53 hospitals, 600+ specialty care clinics, 250+ outpatient clinics, 150+ primary care clinics, 29 pharmacies, 30+ ambulatory surgery centers, 60+ urgent care clinics, and over 7,300 active physicians. The system also includes a state certified health maintenance organization, the Scott and White Health Plan and the Baylor Scott & White Quality Alliance accountable care organization both covering approximately 1,200,000 lives.BSW Marble Falls offers a 24/7 emergency department, a Level IV Trauma Center and provides a wide network of medical expertise and resources. The medical center and adjacent specialty clinic offer a full range of personalized diagnostic and treatment services and multiple specialties.During the fiscal year, BSW Marble Falls admitted 2,831 patients resulting in 10,058 days of care; delivered 376 babies and received 26,616 emergency department visits. Additionally, BSW Marble Falls provided community benefits (as reported to the Texas Department of State Health Services and in accordance with the State of Texas Statutory methodology) of $12,549,435 and provided community benefits (as reported on the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 990, Schedule H) of $7,415,019 during the tax year. The Texas Annual Statement of Community Benefit Standard includes approximately $4,817,397 of unreimbursed cost of Medicare that is not included in the IRS Form 990, Schedule H.See Schedule H for more information regarding these services and how BSW Marble Falls promotes the health of the communities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 66
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.3%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 86.7%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 50%; rating input score 50; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.8%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.74; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.79; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.3%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.5% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 77.3% of revenue deployed · 86.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 18 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $129M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $2.3M · 33 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $12.2M reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 110 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 50/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 50/100.