Scan Health Plan Texas Inc

What it reported doing in 2024

Independence at home: scan's mission of keeping seniors healthy and independent is not limited to scan members. Scan recognizes its responsibility to enhance the quality of life for all those in the communities we serve. To that end, scan sponsors and promotes innovative geriatric services, invests in significant community education and outreach efforts, and supports like-minded community organizations through grants. The cornerstone of scan's community engagement comes through independence at home (iah), scan's community benefit division. Iah programs are geared to support the underserved, frail and disabled older adults and their caregivers in our community.iah's hallmark programs are:- insights: this program offers free, accessible mental health support for older adults and their caregivers through behavioral health classes. These sessions deliver psychoeducational content on topics such as depression, anxiety, grief and loss, and social isolation, among others, and are available in both english and spanish. In collaboration with nonprofits and senior-focused organizations across scan's Texas service areas, iah promotes culturally responsive programming and extensive community outreach.in 2024, a total of 45 behavioral health classes were delivered in various community settings reaching 311 class participants .- community health education: this program offers free, accessible classes and workshops that promote healthy aging and support older adults and their caregivers in adopting healthy lifestyles. Covering more than 50 topicsincluding health, wellness, technology, and social connectionthese sessions are delivered in english and spanish. In partnership with nonprofits and senior-serving organizations across scan's Texas service regions, iah ensures culturally responsive programming and broad community reach.in 2024, a total of 146 classes were delivered in various community settings reaching 2,800 class participants. - scan health plan community giving program: scan's community giving (cg) program is focused on meeting an individual's basic needs including nutrition, shelter, health and socialization, and on enhancing an individual's ability to remain independent in their own community. This is accomplished through one-time operating grants. The scan community giving staff identify organizations whose mission aligns with the program priorities. As a result of this approach, the majority of grantees are identified and contacted by our staff.policies and procedures: a. Identification and vetting of potential program grantees - the director and community giving staff, collaboratewith various scan health plan departments (i.e., health care services and independence at home) and reputable agencies to identify prospective grantee organizations. The prospective grantees undergo the community giving vetting process and are measured against the following criteria: 1) alignment with the scan health plan mission; 2) verified status as a nonprofit or governmental agency with tax-exempt status; 3) history of direct service to older adults and caregivers and; 4) operational history, with a minimum of three years as a legal entity. Successful candidates are added to the larger scan health plan grantee pool.b. Short listing potential grantees - the director and community giving staff use various methods, including outbound calls, internet research, local 2-1-1, nonprofit 990 databases, foundation directories and nonprofit & social service sector industry reports to review the potential grantee pool and generate a shortlist.c. Evaluation and selection of grantees by the community giving committee (cgc) - the cgc is composed of representatives from different levels of management and is led by a designated committee chair. The cgc meets on a quarterly basis and its role is twofold: 1) evaluate, select, and decide the amount to be awarded to the grantee organizations, and 2) steer the community giving program. The cgc bases its decision to m

Financial Efficiency

• Mission deployment rate: 70.9%; rating input score 71
• Program expense ratio: 93.4%; rating input score 93
• Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

• Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 13th percentile among comparable filings
• Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
  • Compensation committee: Missing
  • Independent consultant: Missing
  • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
  • Written employment contract: Missing
  • Compensation survey or study: Missing
  • Board or committee approval: Missing
• Foreign activity oversight: Limited
• Grant itemization coverage: 93.5%; rating input score 93; 28th percentile among comparable filings
• Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
• Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

• Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
• Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
  • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
  • Whistleblower policy: Pass
  • Document-retention policy: Pass
  • CEO compensation review process: Fail
  • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
  • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
  • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
  • Audit committee oversight: Pass
  • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

• Operating margin: 24.2%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
• Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.2; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
• Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.34; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
• Officer compensation ratio: 88%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

• Program expense growth: 23.8% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
• Revenue growth: 29.2% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
• Asset growth: 34.1% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings