Saint Louise Regional Hospital
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 912154437
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020
- Location
- Woodland Hills, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8185321020
- Rating
- 53
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,977,416
- Expenses
- $3,383,273
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- TY CONNER (DIRECTOR (THRU 4/2021)): $562,753 total reported compensation
- JACK KROUSKUP (BOARD MEMBER (THRU 4/2021)): $100,000 total reported compensation
- ANDREW PINES (BOARD MEMBER (THRU 4/2021)): $75,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Saint louise regional hospital ("slrh"), a California nonprofit corporation, is a 93-bed acute care hospital in gilroy, ca, which serves south santa clara and san benito counties. Slrh also operates an urgent care center on its morgan (see schedule o)
What it reported doing in 2020
The saint louise regional hospital assets were sold and the programs relating to patient services were transferred to santa clara county with the asset sale as of february 28, 2019. Any program service activities reported here are those essential to transition the programs from slrh. Slrh also did not operate a hospital at any time during fy 2021. The entity is in the process of winding down for eventual dissolution.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 58
- Transparency & Controls: 72
- Accountability: 30
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 51.2%; rating input score 51
- Program expense ratio: 90.4%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Limited
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 43.4%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.8%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -18.5% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -8.2% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -8.4% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 51.2% of revenue deployed · 90.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 1 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $563K · 5 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2009 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 16 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.