O'connor Hospital

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
912154436
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2020
Location
Woodland Hills, CA, USA
Phone
8185321020
Rating
61
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospital, General

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$144,131
Expenses
$3,656,722
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • TY CONNER (DIRECTOR (THRU 04/2021)): $562,753 total reported compensation
  • JACK KROUSKUP (BOARD MEMBER (THRU 04/2021)): $100,000 total reported compensation
  • ANDREW PINES (BOARD MEMBER (THRU 04/2021)): $75,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

O'connor hospital ("och"), a California nonprofit corporation, is a 358-bed acute care hospital in san jose, ca. Och offers a full range of inpatient and outpatient medical, surgical, and specialty programs. Services include: cardiology and cardiac (see schedule o)rehabilitation; orthopedic and joint replacement; spine and pain management; stroke; women's health; oncology diagnosis and treatment; and services provided at the wound care clinic. Och's emergency department features 23-beds, board-certified physicians, and specialty-trained nurses. Och is home to one of the few family medicine residency programs in the bay area, an affiliation with stanford university. As of february 28, 2019, o'connor hospital assets were sold to santa clara county, a governmental entity, as required by the bylaws and the articles of incorporation of the hosptial.

What it reported doing in 2020

The o'connor hospital assets were sold and the programs relating to patient services were transferred to santa clara county with the asset sale as of february 28, 2019. Any program service activities reported here are those essential to transition the programs from och. Och also did not operate a hospital at any time during fy20 & fy21. The entity is in the process of winding down for eventual dissolution.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 97% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 68
  • Accountability: 30
  • Sustainability: 5
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 87.5%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Limited
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2,437.1%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.7%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -19.1% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -9.1% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -13.8% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 87.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 1 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $563K · 5 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 18 of 19 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2009 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 16 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 43/100.