Saint Francis Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
431111276
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Cape Girardeau, MO, USA
Phone
5733313000
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,159,821
Expenses
$1,831,390
Assets
$12,051,717
Liabilities
$869,883

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JUSTIN DAVISON (CEO - SFHS)
  • STACY HUFF (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • JUSTIN DAVISON (CEO - SFHS): $1,065,787 total reported compensation
  • RYAN DAVIS MD (DIRECTOR): $613,003 total reported compensation
  • STEVEN OGBURN (VP OF SFMP): $547,531 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The saint francis medical center foundation is a not-for-profit corporation operated exclusively for the benefit of saint francis healthcare system and saint francis medical center. Its purpose is to acquire the resources needed for the medical center to fulfill its goals and objectives. These goals include taking a leadership position in providing high quality, cost-effective acute care and outpatient services to the people of this area. The foundation's mission will refelect the medical center's priorities. It will strive to increase awareness, understanding and acceptance among the facility's many publics. All fundraising efforts will be aimed at strengthening the institution overall and reaffirming its mission to its fullest potential. The foundation will secure financial support for current operations, special projects, capital expansion, long-term financial stability and other needs as identified by the medical center.

What it reported doing in 2024

Amount represents assistance paid to saint francis medical center and other local agencies and individuals for nursing, building and equipment purchases, lodging assistance, transportation assistance, tobacco prevention and cessation, assistance for cancer patients, nicu, family birthplace, arthritis programs, hospice programs, and new services and technology.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 77% for direct work, and 23% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and some related-organization disclosures are missing.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 65
  • Transparency & Controls: 89
  • Accountability: 74
  • Sustainability: 69
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75.7%; rating input score 76
  • Program expense ratio: 68.1%; rating input score 68
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 64.3%; rating input score 64; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 15.2%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.58; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 12.4%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 75.7% of revenue deployed · 68.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 14 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.1M · 18 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 25 of 26 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.