Rush Copley Medical Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 363193787
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Aurora, IL, USA
- Phone
- 6309786200
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $8,160
- Assets
- $8,648,048
- Liabilities
- $70,956,884
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
27 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- John Diederich MA MBA FACHE (President & CEO/Director)
Highest reported compensation
- John Diederich MA MBA FACHE (President & CEO/Director): $1,351,452 total reported compensation
- Carl T Bergetz JD (Chief Legal Officer, RUSH & Board Secretary, RCMC (START 11/24)): $1,335,342 total reported compensation
- Gaurav Shah MD START 924 (CHIEF OF STAFF/DIRECTOR): $1,113,686 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.
What it reported doing in 2024
Rush copley medical center ("rcmc") is the sole corporate member of copley memorial hospital, inc. ("cmh"), copley ventures, inc. ("cv"), and rush copley foundation ("rcf"). Rcmc is affiliated with rush university medical center ("rumc"), an academic medical center in chicago, Illinois, for the purpose of creating a regional delivery system to improve the medical, capital, and management resources available to cmh and rcmc in their market areas. Rcmc serves as a parent supporting organization for other organizations in the health system, helping to facilitate the provision of healthcare to the community. The purposes for which rcmc is organized are: 1. To establish, acquire, support, erect, maintain, control, own and equip healthcare providers and institutions, including, without limiting the foregoing, hospitals, nursing homes, skilled nursing facilities, intermediate care facilities and ambulatory care centers; to conduct, sponsor, support, promote, develop, own and operate charitable, educational, scientific and scholastic programs and activities; and other activities and programs ancillary to and in support of the foregoing; 2. To foster, promote, support, develop, encourage, maintain, receive and accept funds, gifts, and contributions for and on behalf of such activities; 3. To establish, conduct, sponsor, acquire, own, maintain and operate such other entities and activities which, in the opinion of the board of directors and at its discretion, will support the foregoing; 4. Exclusively for the benefit of and to carry out some or all of the purposes of organizations described in either section 509(a)(1) or 509(a)(2) of the internal revenue code of 1986, as amended, or any subsequent law of the united states. In no instance, however, will rcmc engage in the practice of medicine, psychiatry or psychology.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 58
- Accountability: 85
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 90%; rating input score 90; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1,059.81; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 8.2; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5,118.8%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 18 of 20 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.4M · 27 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 15 of 16 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 16 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.