Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of South

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
591899866
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Miami, FL, USA
Phone
7864762176
Rating
71
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Rehabilitative Medical Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,618,621
Expenses
$3,846,323
Assets
$30,852,133
Liabilities
$3,095,435

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

23 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RICKY WADE (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ALEX RODRIGUEZ (PRESIDENT)
  • SORAYA R MOYA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • SORAYA R MOYA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $125,446 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

At ronald mcdonald house, we provide essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

What it reported doing in 2025

The ronald mcdonald house is the largest program of the organization. The number of clients served: families served 300 days of care provided: total number of nights: 9,487 number of session or events held: 5 signature fundraising events publications issued - none impact on the community - the ronald mcdonald house assists avoid expensive hotel stays and meal costs during prolonged hospitalizations. This is especially critical for lower-income families or those traveling from rural or distant areas. An average family can save more than $6,000 a month when they stay at the house for at least 30 days. Other non-measurable achievements: the ronald mcdonald house also provides assistance to families inside pediatric hospitals with a program called "hospitality a la carte". This program assists 1,170 families inside the hospital. Volunteers take the cheerful cart and provide coffee, cookies, pastries, books, blankets and toys throughout the pediatric cancer units providing a moment of respite.in 2021, the board of directors approved the construction of a new residential facility (the "project") to replace the organization's existing house. The new facility is being constructed on the campus of jackson memorial medical center. Construction of the new facility was in progress as of december 31, 2025. The organization continued to operate from its existing facility in miami, Florida.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 66% for direct work, and 34% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 54
  • Transparency & Controls: 69
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 85
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 33.7%; rating input score 34
  • Program expense ratio: 83.2%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $41.12 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 88.2%; rating input score 88; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 4.2%; rating input score 4; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 63.8%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.02; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.3%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 33.7% of revenue deployed · 83.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 22 of 22 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $3.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $125K · 23 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $102K reported
  • Consistency: 30 of 32 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 34/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 4/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.