Rogers Behavioral Health System Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 263902724
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Oconomowoc, WI, USA
- Phone
- 2626464411
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,873,069
- Expenses
- $1,873,069
- Assets
- $2,080,169
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CYNTHIA MEYER (PRESIDENT AND CEO)
- JOHN BOYD (FORMER CEO - TERMED 05/2023)
Highest reported compensation
- CYNTHIA MEYER (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $1,101,336 total reported compensation
- KHAZI MUQEET MD (ASSOC. CMO AND BOARD MEMBER): $637,026 total reported compensation
- CHRIS JAGODITZ (CFO): $505,147 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our vision: we envision a future where people have the tools to rise above the challenges of mental illness, addiction, and stigma to lead healthy lives. We bring this vision to life by constantly elevating the standard for behavioral healthcare, demonstrating our exceptional treatment outcomes, and acting with compassion and respect.our values: excellence - we are committed to continuous improvement including recruitment and retention of highly talented employees who deliver clinically effective treatments with the best possible outcomes.compassion - we are dedicated to a healthy culture where employees, patients, and families experience empathy, encouragement, and respect.accountability - we embrace our responsibility to our patients, families, referring providers, payors and community members to provide care that is high quality, cost effective and sustainable.
What it reported doing in 2024
Rogers behavioral health system, inc. (rbh, inc.) was formed to coordinate the activities of affiliate organizations - rogers memorial hospital, inc. And rogers memorial hospital foundation, inc. - with the goal of expanding access to behavioral health services. Rbh, inc. Establishes, monitors and executes strategic initiatives. Rbh, inc. Is one of the nation's largest providers of specialized behavioral health services. In fiscal year 2024 we served our community with 59,399 inpatient days 94,546 residential patient days and 273,640 outpatient patient days. This represents a -1.55% decrease over the prior fiscal year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 67
- Accountability: 93
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.6%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 84.6%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.11; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 86.6%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.6% of revenue deployed · 84.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 16 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.1M · 18 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 17 of 17 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay and related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 8 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.