Resolve to Save Lives Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 862254152
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Alexandria, VA, USA
- Phone
- 3322821495
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $65,629,780
- Expenses
- $65,415,547
- Assets
- $145,002,618
- Liabilities
- $20,213,610
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- THOMAS FRIEDEN (PRESIDENT & CEO)
- AMANDA MCCLELLAND (SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT)
- RENU GARG (SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- THOMAS FRIEDEN (PRESIDENT & CEO): $570,561 total reported compensation
- AMANDA MCCLELLAND (SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT): $354,297 total reported compensation
- JEANNIE MANTOPOULOS (COO/TREASURER): $340,358 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to accelerate action against the world's deadliest health threats to save millions of lives.
What it reported doing in 2024
Cardiovascular health - high blood pressure is the world's leading cause of death. Despite availability of safe, effective and low cost treatment, only one out of seven adults with hypertension have their blood pressure controlled. We work with partners to reduce heart attack and stroke by:-increasing the number of people whose blood pressure is controlled from 14% to 50% by 2050;-reducing global dietary intake of salt by 30% by 2050;-making food safer by eliminating artificial trans fat from global food supply by 2030.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 44% for direct work, and 56% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.7%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 81.9%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $48.84 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Pass
- Conducts field audits: Pass
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Pass
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Pass
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.3%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.22; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.3%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 17.1% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -55.2% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.7% of revenue deployed · 81.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $53.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $571K · 18 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.1M reported
- Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 23 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 10 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 3 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.