Refugees International Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521224516
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2028280110
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Migration, Refugee Issues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,164,885
- Expenses
- $3,427,455
- Assets
- $7,714,905
- Liabilities
- $1,888,476
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEREMY M KONYNDYK (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JEFFREY TINDELL (CO-CHAIR (UNTIL APRIL))
- MAUREEN WHITE (CO-CHAIR (JAN-APR),CHAIR (MAY-JUNE))
- DARYA NASR (DIR. (JAN -APRIL) VC (MAY-JUNE))
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Refugees international advocates for lifesaving assistance, human rights, and protection for displaced people and promotes solutions to displacement crisis.
What it reported doing in 2025
Main outcomes: between january and june 2025, refugees international advanced a sustained advocacy agenda focused on protection pathways, crisis response, and principled humanitarian policy across 8 countries in multiple regions. Core areas of engagement included the escalating humanitarian catastrophe sudan, kenya, occupied palestinian territories and myanmar, alongside continued attention to u.s. Border and deportation policy. Throughout this period, refugees international issued statements, situation updates, and event briefings that highlighted deteriorating conditions in conflict settings and emphasized the need for diplomatic engagement, restored aid flows, and stronger civilian protection.refugees international also intensified its engagement on u.s. Immigration and protection policy during this period. The organization provided expert testimony to congress, challenged the rollback of humanitarian parole pathways, and highlighted the risks posed by the termination of programs serving cubans, haitians, nicaraguans, and venezuelans. Through regular updates, refugees international documented the growing dangers facing people affected by mass deportations, loss of work authorization, and abrupt shifts in asylum processing. The organization continued to advocate for reforms that safeguard due process, expand protection mechanisms, and uphold the rights of those seeking safety at the u.s. Southern border.in early 2025, refugees international strengthened its commitment to refugee leadership and community-led responses. The organization welcomed a new cohort of refugee fellows, expanded its work with refugee-led organizations in east africa, and convened public events including a world refugee day town hall to elevate displaced leaders shaping humanitarian policy. Across its programs, refugees international emphasized localization and equitable partnerships, arguing that in an era of constrained aid, empowering communities and refugee-led initiatives is essential to sustaining effective and principled humanitarian response.in 2025 refugees international continued to travel into the field. Refugees international's analysis of the evolving situation in syria highlighted the urgent need for sustained humanitarian engagement and rights-based support for displaced syrians amid widespread return movements and reconstruction challenges following the fall of the assad regime, welcoming measures such as the u.s. Treasury's general license no. 25 as a step toward enabling aid and stabilization while urging continued protections for voluntary and safe returns.additionally, in bangladesh, refugees international documented and warned against the detrimental impacts of deepening aid cuts on rohingya refugees in cox's bazar, emphasizing that while last-minute donor support helped avert drastic ration reductions, ongoing shortfalls continue to threaten food security, services, and prospects for durable solutions for over a million refugees.refugees international hosted a world refugee day 2025 town hall in june that convened experts and 2025 fellows to discuss emerging research, share firsthand testimony on displacement drivers and policy impacts, and mobilize public support for protection measures.across this period, refugees international continued to expand its thought leadership output and media engagement, issuing statements and analyses on issues ranging from u.s. Asylum enforcement to global policy obligations in climate displacement.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 87% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 73
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 65
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.2%; rating input score 67
- Program expense ratio: 81.2%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: $15.38 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: 98.8%; rating input score 99; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.7%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.25; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 67.2% of revenue deployed · 81.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $2.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 20 people listed
- Consistency: 37 of 38 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and grants
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 7 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 51/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.