One Climb

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
821959606
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2022
Forms available
Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2017
Location
Saint Louis, MO, USA
Phone
3146211700
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development Programs

Reported finances

Revenue
$198,465
Expenses
$187,692
Assets
$269,945
Liabilities
$419

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KEVIN JORGESON (FOUNDER AND PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • KEVIN JORGESON (FOUNDER AND PRESIDENT)
  • DANIEL CHANCELLOR (FOUNDER AND SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

One climb's mission is to introduce 100,000 kids to the sport of indoor rock climbing and enable them to build relationships through climbing. One climb establishes relationships with boys & girls clubs in the community to install climbing walls and obtain other necessary supplies.

What it reported doing in 2022

Climbing walls: one climb has facilitated the installation of eleven climbing walls to date. To achieve this, we have partnered with boys & girls clubs with a local climbing gym to assist with the maintenance and sustainability of each climbing wall. In fiscal year 2023, we have continued construction on projects in benton county and stamford. We also have a new adidas project in the works in west oakland and are moving forward with a project at the smilow boys and girls club with eldorado climbing.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 64
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 62.9%; rating input score 63
  • Program expense ratio: 66.4%; rating input score 66

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.4%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.44; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 33.8%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -52.7% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -30.3% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 62.9% of revenue deployed · 66.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $125K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2020 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 54/100.