Older Adults Technology Services
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 550882599
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 7183601707
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $15,870,195
- Expenses
- $15,792,950
- Assets
- $16,207,586
- Liabilities
- $9,536,314
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Thomas Kamber (OATS Executive Director)
Highest reported compensation
- Scott M Frisch (AARP EVP - COO): $946,583 total reported compensation
- Frederick Fields (VP-Strat,Planning&Admin&Treasurer until 10/1/2025): $521,081 total reported compensation
- Sarah Shaw (AARP SVP - Secretary): $469,860 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization's mission is to harness the power of technology to change the way we age.
What it reported doing in 2025
Senior Planet is the name of the award-winning set of program experiences through which OATS engages a diverse array of older adults and the organizations that serve them across America. Individual Senior Planet participants share a collective commitment to "Aging with Attitude and their active participation in the world-class programming that OATS delivers through a variety of delivery channels sparks measurable changes in outlook and behavior that produce outcomes in specific dimensions of an older adult's life: increased social connection, improved health, greater financial security, more active participation as citizens and advocates, and access to new pathways to creativity.While OATS itself delivers Senior Planet programs in person in several key US markets and virtually at seniorplanet.org, the organization also offers a unique licensing program that enables hundreds of qualified community-based sites to provide in-person Senior Planet experiences to older residents in their local urban, suburban, and rural communities in more than 39 states across America.Below is a summary of the key accomplishments of OATS in 2025.2025 Key Projects: Senior Planet delivered 845,000 engagements to new and returning participants through our virtual, in-person, and licensing programs.Senior Planet offered nearly 4,000 live online classes, with participants from all fifty states engaging in these programs over 520,000 times. Senior Planet continued its popular fitness offerings, while also testing new formats, such as short, live tech demos and multi-week classes in fitness, watercolor painting, and baking. The Contact Center had its busiest year yet, handling more than 60,000 calls and emails for program inquiries and technical support sessions. Senior Planet centers in Miami, Plattsburgh, and Denver maintained their operations, while in-person training continued through partners in Texas, Maryland, and California. The New York City center temporarily closed its doors as Senior Planet developed a new state-of-the-art space in midtown Manhattan. The organization also continued delivering in-person programs in collaboration with AARP state offices across the country.Verizon launched its partnership with OATS to deliver co-branded technology education focused on digital wellness for adults ages 50 and older. Older adults received training in smartphone use and safety across all three Senior Planet channels, with in-person activities at select Verizon retail stores. By December 2025, Senior Planet and partners delivered more than 1,800 training sessions, generating nearly 30,000 engagements.NYC's Department for the Aging continued its 10-year partnership with OATS through the Connected Communities Initiative. The goal of this public-sector partnership is aimed at closing the digital divide among older New Yorkers by providing digital skills training in NYC Older Adult Center locations.With support from the Humana Foundation, OATS embarked on a two-and-a-half-year project to reduce loneliness and social isolation among older adults living in underserved areas across the country. Year 1 of the "Aging Reconnected" grant focused on developing an assessment tool and collecting resources to strengthen social connections among seniors.Expansion of the Senior Planet Licensing Program: The Senior Planet licensing program powerfully equips local organizations across the country with the tools to help older adults access technology and use it to enhance their lives. Through an adaptable program model, the Senior Planet licensing structure works with community-based organizations to develop local trainers to deliver Senior Planet's proprietary curriculum and bring Senior Planet's world-class programs to older adults in their area. In 2025, the Senior Planet Licensing program expanded to 740 licensing sites nationwide, covering 39 states. Thought Leadership Highlights: In 2025, OATS staff and leadership participated in 77 total speaking engagements, reac
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 88.9%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 89.3%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: $87.03 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.5%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.03; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.59; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 15.6%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 19% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 17% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.5% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 88.9% of revenue deployed · 89.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $14.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $947K · 20 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.5M reported
- Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 49 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 48 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.