Northside Behavioral Health Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 591641327
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Tampa, FL, USA
- Phone
- 8139778700
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Mental Health Treatment F31 Psychiatric, Mental Health Hospital
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $14,015,126
- Expenses
- $17,148,601
- Assets
- $4,658,423
- Liabilities
- $6,722,921
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GAIL RYDER (TRUSTEE/VICE PRESIDENT & SECRETARY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH)
Highest reported compensation
- LOUIS GALDIERI (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $1,212,845 total reported compensation
- RONALD BEAMON (VP, CFO BAYCARE HOSP DIV): $975,683 total reported compensation
- GAIL RYDER (TRUSTEE/VICE PRESIDENT & SECRETARY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH): $646,620 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To improve the health of all we serve through community-owned health care services that set the standard for high-quality, compassionate care. AS a part of BayCare Health System, Northside Behavioral Health Center is the best place to work, receive and provide care. We are powered by an extraordinary team that delivers quality, drives innovation and embraces inclusivity.
What it reported doing in 2024
Medical services - psychiatric care, therapy and medication administration to improve the functioning or prevent further deterioration of children and adults with mental health or substance abuse problems. Outpatient - individual counseling services designed to improve the functioning or prevent further deterioration of children and adults with mental health and/or substance abuse problems. Crisis stabilization - 24-hour, 7 day-per-week brief, intensive mental health residential treatment services to meet the needs of individuals who are experiencing an acute crisis and who, in the absence of a suitable alternative, would require hospitalization. Other program services include case management, crisis management, detox programs, prevention and intervention, supported housing, and group support programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 64% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 75
- Sustainability: 10
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 88.7%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 72.7%; rating input score 73; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -22.4%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.44; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.9%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 88.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 11 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.2M · 17 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.1M reported
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 40 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.