Northeast Florida Healthcare Coalition Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
813064292
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Jacksonville, FL, USA
Phone
9042790880
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$748,884
Expenses
$748,884
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

People named in this filing

  • DAVE CHAPMAN (CHAIR)
  • GAVIN BUTLER (VICE CHAIR)
  • SUSAN CHAPMAN (SECRETARY/TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To understand and meet the actual health and medical needs of the whole community. The coalition is intended as a vehicle to coordinate and maintain current hospital preparedness levels while enhancing disaster preparedness and resiliency in other portions of the healthcare system. These efforts also help improve medical surge capacity and capability, further enhancing a community's health system preparedness for disasters and public health emergencies.

What it reported doing in 2024

Function 1: develop, refine or sustain healthcare coalitions*essential members*additional partners*evidence of partnerships*governance documentation*multi-agency coordination during responsefunction 2: coordinate healthcare planning to prepare the healthcare system for a disaster*healthcare system situational assessments*healthcare system disaster planningfunction 3: identify and prioritize essential healthcare assets and services*priority healthcare assets and essential services planning*equipment to assist healthcare organizations with the provision of critical servicesfunction 4: determine gaps in healthcare preparedness and identify resources for mitigation of these gaps*resource elements (plans, equipment, skills, healthcare resources assessment)*address healthcare information gapsfunction 5: coordinate training to assist healthcare responders to develop the necessary skills to respond*resource elements*nimsfunction 6: improve healthcare response capabilities through coordinated exercise and evaluation *exercise plans*exercise implementation and coordinationfunction 7: coordinate with planning for at-risk individuals and those with special medical needs*status of vulnerable populations and potential impact on healthcare delivery*healthcare planning for at-risk individuals and functional needs

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 71% for direct work, and 29% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 81
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 91.5%; rating input score 92
  • Program expense ratio: 91.5%; rating input score 92
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 72.4%; rating input score 72; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -29.6% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 91.5% of revenue deployed · 91.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $686K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 21 of 22 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 20 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 20 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.