Neighborhood Partnerships Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 911943624
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Portland, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5032263001
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Philanthropy, Voluntarism, and Grantmaking Foundations N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,532,338
- Expenses
- $5,278,796
- Assets
- $25,721,390
- Liabilities
- $24,658,854
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- REBECCA NICKELS (INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- ROBERTA PHLLIP-ROBBINS (ORGANIZATIONAL DIRECTOR): $62,115 total reported compensation
- REBECCA NICKELS (INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $51,538 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See schedule oneighborhood partnerships, inc. (np or the organization) is an Oregon non-profit corporation founded in 1989 whose mission is to help create a better Oregon, one in which we all have access to opportunity, stability, and what we need to thrive. For the organization, this begins with the basic human needs of having a stable and secure place to call home, and financial well-being. The organization receives support from public and private foundations, government agencies, and corporations and individuals.
What it reported doing in 2024
Policy, advocacy, and organizing: through the organization's policy and advocacy efforts, it builds ongoing relationships with decision leaders and inspires them with a passion for building financial resilience and creation of pathways out of poverty. The organizatons supports people who have been directly impacted by economic and housing instability to both inform policy proposals and speak directly to decision makers. Neighborhood partnerships acts as a convener for the statewide housing alliance, which acts to educate policy makers and advocate for affordable housing needs across Oregon. In 2019, the organization began working with residents of affordable housing to organize and build power with them. Continued on schedule oresidents have worked together to form the network, residents organizing for change, or roc, which is led by people with lived experience with housing instability.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 65% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 88.5%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 90.3%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: $33.08 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.6%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.87; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.96; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.2%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.9% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 88.5% of revenue deployed · 90.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $4.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $62K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 11 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.