Methodist Health System
Legal name: Nebraska Methodist Health System Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 470639839
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Omaha, NE, USA
- Phone
- 4023544840
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Health Systems
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $100,692,563
- Expenses
- $95,441,971
- Assets
- $1,975,188,802
- Liabilities
- $719,590,479
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
30 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEPHEN L GOESER (PRES/CEO NE METH HEALTH)
- SHARI FLOWERS (VICE PRESIDENT COMPLIANCE)
- JEFF PROCHAZKA (VICE PRESIDENT STRATEGIC P)
- SHANNA STOFER (VICE PRESIDENT INTEGRATED SVCS)
Highest reported compensation
- STEPHEN L GOESER (PRES/CEO NE METH HEALTH): $1,651,418 total reported compensation
- JOSEPHINE ABBOUD (EXECUTIVE): $883,078 total reported compensation
- JEFFREY E FRANCIS (CFO): $841,711 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Caring Side of Innovation Methodist delivers advanced, forward-thinking care built around what matters most you. Mission, Vision, Values and Commitment At Methodist, our enduring commitment is providing the best care possible for you and your loved ones. We treat you as we would want our own family members to be treated: with great compassion and expertise based upon the latest proven measures of clinical quality. Section Menu. At Methodist, our enduring commitment is providing the best care possible for you and your loved ones. Section Menu About Toggle Submenu.
What it reported doing in 2024
Best care eap is a premier provider of customized employee assistance programs, management consultation, employee and leadership training and development, performance coaching and work/life services. Best care eap partners with organizations across the country to facilitate a healthier, more productive workforce.the employee assistance program (eap) conducts critical support activities for traumatic events such as the death of an employee, workplace accidents, natural disasters and violence in the workplace. Trauma response includes immediate phone consultation. The goal of trauma response is to minimize the damage created by the ordeal and to speed the recovery process for personnel and the organization. Eap also assists managers in recognizing post-trauma symptoms and provides guidance on how to refer the employee to eap. During and after, counselors will identify and refer those employees needing further counseling assistance. Specially trained professional counselors conduct short term counseling services to help individuals and families offering an unbiased, informal and confidential environment to work through personal problems and financial difficulties. This was especially important during the covid-19 pandemic of 2020 - 2022.during 2024, the eap also facilitated employee and supervisory training in such areas as management, wellness, attitude/motivation and human resources topics.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 92% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.2%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 90.1%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 97.2%; rating input score 97; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 78.6%; rating input score 79; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.2%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 20.7; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.36; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.3%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 85.2% of revenue deployed · 90.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 14 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $86M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.7M · 30 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $4.2M reported
- Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 18 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 13 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.