National Center for Families Learning Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
611159549
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Louisville, KY, USA
Phone
5025841133
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Remedial Reading, Reading Encouragement

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$12,164,588
Expenses
$12,257,779
Assets
$20,575,567
Liabilities
$1,172,136

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • FELICIA CUMINGS SMITH (PRESIDENT & CEO)
  • TONY PEYTON (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT)
  • SHEA COUGHLIN (SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • FELICIA CUMINGS SMITH (PRESIDENT & CEO): $306,370 total reported compensation
  • TONY PEYTON (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT): $197,610 total reported compensation
  • SHEA COUGHLIN (SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT): $162,145 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Ncfl works to eradicate poverty through education solutions for families.

What it reported doing in 2024

Family literacy programs: ncfl's family literacy programs operate under the traditional, four component family literacy model and is federally defined. Family literacy includes adult education, children's education, parent education, and interactive parent-child activities. This place-based model is built on intensity and duration of services and is focused on both child and adult outcomes. Family leadership: ncfl defines family leadership as strategies and services that improve and enhance the leadership skills of parenting adults and that are designed to support families in becoming better champions for themselves, their families, and communities. Ncfl programs are underpinned by a research-based family service-learning framework intended to strengthen communities by fostering leadership skills. This six-step approach is meant to provide parent leaders with a guide for solving an existing community problem and to serve as a template for addressing future problems.family engagement: ncfl defines family engagement as the partnership between families and practitioners aimed at providing children and families with voice and agency throughout educational systems and within communities for the benefit of improving learning outcomes. Ncfl offers three types of family engagement models to support student success across p-12 learning environments. Ncfl supports family engagement through in and out-of-school-time experiences through a variety of resources including opportunities to learn in public and school libraries.collaborative community models: ncfl supports the creation, facilitation, and enhancement of collaborative community models in locations across the country to build aligned and coordinate family learning systems that support multigenerational programs, birth through adulthood. These collaboratives serve as an anchor for the community to identify shared goals, language, and data. Community collaboratives unite a cross-sector group of community stakeholders that welcome and work alongside families to build multigenerational systems of learning that are streamlined, connected, and meet expressed family learning needs and priorities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 91% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 77
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.4%; rating input score 82
  • Program expense ratio: 81%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: $10.52 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 84.9%; rating input score 85; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.8%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.68; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.7%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82.4% of revenue deployed · 81% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $9.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $306K · 18 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 34 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 29 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 40/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.