OneWorld Community Health Centers

Legal name: Oneworld Community Health Centers Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
470548990
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025
Location
Omaha, NE, US
Phone
(402) 734-4110
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$81,647,693
Expenses
$70,610,540
Assets
$96,462,003
Liabilities
$14,624,212

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

27 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANDREA SKOLKIN (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANDREA SKOLKIN (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $431,339 total reported compensation
  • DR WILLIAM OSTDIEK (CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER): $352,611 total reported compensation
  • DR SPENCER BURTON (ASSOCIATE DENTAL DIRECTOR): $313,729 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Care for All People

What it reported doing in 2025

Oneworld operates 10 health clinics for underserved populations residing primarily in historically underinvested immigrant areas in douglas, sarpy, and cass counties in Nebraska, where residents face barriers to accessing health care including disproportionately higher chronic disease. The organization additionally operates 6 school-based health clinics and 2 teen and young adult centers in the omaha metropolitan area along with one medical mobile clinic. Services include family care, women's health services, pediatric services, radiology, and counseling and psychiatric services. Total medical and behavioral health visits were 131,401.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 83.2%; rating input score 83
  • Program expense ratio: 89.3%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: $83.5 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.5%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.37; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.8%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 83.2% of revenue deployed · 89.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $63.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $431K · 27 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $8M reported
  • Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 17 filing years from 2009 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.