National Association of Home Builders (NAHB)

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
880359303
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Washington, DC, United States
Phone
1-800-368-5242
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$90,020,827
Expenses
$89,381,900
Assets
$155,550,278
Liabilities
$119,580,343

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

118 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JAMES TOBIN (PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • JAMES TOBIN (PRESIDENT & CEO): $1,258,484 total reported compensation
  • JAMES RIZZO (FORMER EVP-CHIEF LEGAL OFFICER): $810,954 total reported compensation
  • GEOFFREY CASSIDY (CHIEF REVENUE OFFICER): $604,597 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

NAHB advocates for housing and the housing industry.

What it reported doing in 2024

Advocacy: advocacy on behalf of members, the housing industry and housing consumers is one of nahb's most important activities.as the nation's leading housing advocate, nahb strives to promote policies that will keep housing a national priority. In particular, the association works to enhance the business climate for housing and home building and to ensure that all consumers have access to the housing of their choice. Nahb achieves these important goals by actively participating in the legislative process and working with lawmakers to enact legislation that promotes housing and serves members' interests. Nahb works with regulatory agencies and construction code organizations to ensure that policies and regulations are implemented appropriately, and reflect the vital role of housing in the national economy. These efforts aim to prevent unnecessary increases in the cost of producing or purchasing new homes.additionally, nahb's litigation program promotes nahb's and its members' interests in both federal and state courts. Nahb's legal advocacy group challenges regulatory agencies to justify their rules, regulations, and policies in state and federal courts. These legal efforts often yield positive results in the form of court victories or settlements favorable to nahb and the industry.these efforts help consumers by increasing the supply and reducing the cost of housing.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 95% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 62
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 91%; rating input score 91; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.7%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.74; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.77; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site
  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 71 of 78 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.3M · 118 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $7.2M reported
  • Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes foreign activity, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 23 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.