Home Building Industry Disaster Relief Fund Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 203491201
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2022668200
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Disaster Preparedness and Relief Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $53,020
- Expenses
- $41,053
- Assets
- $490,464
- Liabilities
- $502
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID F WILSON (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JAMES TOBIN (SECRETARY): $1,258,484 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The home building industry disaster relief fund (hbidrf) was established to assist areas affected by disaster in order to facilitate the rebuilding of communities. The hbidrf makes funds available for direct contribution to other recognized charities aiming to meet similar primary needs as the hbidrf - shelter, healthcare, education.
What it reported doing in 2024
The home building industry disaster relief fund (hbidrf) has provided grants to charitable organizations that are working in areas impacted by disaster. Typically, the fund works with local nahb members and affiliated home builder associations to identify charities and charitable projects to support through the hbidrf. Since this fund was established in 2005, the hbidrf board of directors has approved over $2.2 million in grants that have been used in the following ways:- home builders institute (la.): to support the creation and/or expansion of job training programs in carpentry, concrete technologies, electrical hva and plumbing. - the university of southern Mississippi foundation/school of construction (miss): to develop and implement residential construction management and disaster response courses and alternate educational delivery mechanisms. - home builders institute (miss): to be used for pact training program to train individuals in construction craft skills for jobs in Mississippi's gulf coast home building industry. Programs that have a direct impact on rebuilding damaged community facilities and housing. Those projects include:- k-bar-b youth ranch/broadway, inc. (la.): to help repair the nonprofit residential treatment facility for children. - pine burr area council of the boy scouts of america (miss.): to help rebuild camptiak. - gulf coast women's center for nonviolence (miss.): to repair and rebuild damaged portions of the shelter and rape crisis center. - southwest Mississippi recovery network (miss.): to purchase building supplies and to repair homes in low-income, rural areas. - carpenter's helper (miss.): to fund charitable work that aims to correct deficient housing conditions for needy, disabled and disadvantaged community members. - united way of acadiana (la.): to repair as many households as possible in the vermilion parish. - housing solutions summit (la.): to help fund educational and charitable assistance portions of a conference that provided a forum for consumers and builders to learn about rebuilding their homes and their communities. - beacon of hope resource center (la.): to cover volunteer activities for a rebuilding/clean-up project in new orleans during nahb's state and local government affairs conference. - West Virginia katrina relief fund (miss.): to purchase building materials for a team traveling to Mississippi to rebuild homes. - salvation army for el paso flood relief (Texas ): to help the el paso region, which suffered devastating floods in august 2006. - Florida disaster recovery fund (fla.): to meet the long-term recovery needs of floridians impacted by natural disasters, restoring lives and communities. - second presbyterian church (ill): to purchase building materials for a team of Illinois builders traveling to Louisiana to rebuild homes. - salvation army of Kansas & western Missouri (kan.): to help greensburg residents rebuild their homes that were devastated by the tornados. - orland park christian reformed church (ill.): to purchase building materials for a team of Illinois builders traveling to Mississippi and Louisiana to rebuild homes. - master builders care foundation (wash.): to help residents in lewis county, Washington rebuild their homes that were damaged by severe floods. - the lending network (wash.): to help residents in thurston county, Washington rebuild homes damaged by severe floods. - rock county united way's long term flood recovery fund (wisc): to repair homes damaged by floods. - Louisiana homebuilders disaster relief fund (la.): to rebuild homes in new orleans affected by hurricane katrina. - hands on disaster response (Iowa): to repair homes damaged by floods. - lutheran social services (minn.): to repair homes damaged by floods. - partnership for children, families and adults (tenn.): to purchase building materials to repair homes damaged by a tornado. - united way of monroe county (miss.): to purchase building materials to repair homes damaged by a torn
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 68
- Sustainability: 59
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.2%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 97.4%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 22.6%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.95; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 194.6%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -12.1% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 17.6% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -5.9% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.2% of revenue deployed · 97.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $40K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.3M · 5 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.