Mount Carmel Home Care Llc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
262729300
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2016
Forms available
Form 990 2016
Location
Westerville, OH, USA
Phone
6142340100
Rating
65
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Home Health Care

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$21,025,214
Expenses
$20,932,205
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ERIN DENHOLM (BOARD MANAGER; THHS CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • ERIN DENHOLM (BOARD MANAGER; THHS CEO): $597,977 total reported compensation
  • AGNES HAGERTY (BRD MGR THR 12/16; GNL CSL THR 6/16): $470,900 total reported compensation
  • MICHAEL SAMYN (FORMER OFFICER; VP FINANCE EAST DIV): $354,403 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We, trinity home health services and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. Mount carmel home care, llc is a member of trinity home health services, mount carmel health system, and trinity health.

What it reported doing in 2016

Since 2008, mount carmel home care has been bringing health care to people in their homes, serving franklin, Delaware, licking, fairfield, pickaway, madison, and union counties. Services include nurse visits, physical, speech and occupational therapy services and iv services. Mount carmel home care provides services to all individuals who apply regardless of their ability to pay. In fiscal year 2017, mount carmel home care provided 120,542 patient visits. Mount carmel home care ceased operations in june 2017 when it transferred its assets to its member, trinity home health services, to carry on its mission. Please visit our website for additional information: www.trinityhealthathome.org/home-care

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 67
  • Accountability: 42
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84.3%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: 88.5%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.4%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.9%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.4% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16.9% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 84.3% of revenue deployed · 88.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 2 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $18.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $598K · 13 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $628K reported
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay and related organizations
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2010 to 2016
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 336 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 40/100.