Mount Carmel Health Plan Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 311471229
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Columbus, OH, USA
- Phone
- 6145464000
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Group Health Practice (Health Maintenance Organizations)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $598,543,717
- Expenses
- $571,018,237
- Assets
- $501,777,966
- Liabilities
- $82,525,095
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LORRAINE LUTTON (DIRECTOR & MOUNT CARMEL CEO THR 6/24)
- JACK RANDOLPH (DIRECTOR; PRESIDENT & CEO)
- TAUANA MCDONALD (DIRECTOR & MOUNT CARMEL CEO AT 7/24)
- ANGELA THOMAS (VICE PRESIDENT, HEALTH SERVICES MCHP)
Highest reported compensation
- LORRAINE LUTTON (DIRECTOR & MOUNT CARMEL CEO THR 6/24): $1,903,502 total reported compensation
- JACK RANDOLPH (DIRECTOR; PRESIDENT & CEO): $1,121,281 total reported compensation
- TAUANA MCDONALD (DIRECTOR & MOUNT CARMEL CEO AT 7/24): $909,604 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We, mount carmel and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.mount carmel health plan is a member of mount carmel and trinity health.
What it reported doing in 2024
Mount carmel health plan was formed in 1996 for the purpose of providing comprehensive health care coverage to seniors in central Ohio as a wholly owned subsidiary of mount carmel health system, a tax-exempt health care system under irc section 501(c)(3). The service area was expanded to cover parts of Iowa in 2021. Mount carmel health plan is a nonprofit organization that offers benefits through a medicare advantage plan (medigold) approved by the centers of medicare and medicaid services (cms) that replaces traditional medicare coverage. Medigold serves seniors and other medicare beneficiaries in 62 Ohio counties and 58 Iowa counties.mount carmel health plan entered into a contract with cms in 1996 as part of a demonstration program to determine the effectiveness of health care providers in providing medicare coverage to seniors. Medigold members elect to have mount carmel health plan (instead of the federal government) administer the benefits of medicare part a and part b, and medigold also offers pharmaceutical coverage under medicare part d. Mount carmel health plan is required to provide coverage for everything that the federal medicare program covers, plus medigold also covers additional items such as: unlimited inpatient hospital days covered at 100% with no deductible; outpatient surgery for a small co-payment; diagnostic and testing services for a small co-payment; home health care and skilled nursing care coverage when necessary; prescription drug benefits; physician office visits with fixed co-payments; and unlimited generic drug coverage.mount carmel health plan has been recognized frequently as the plan that provides the "best value to seniors" in the central Ohio market as measured by independent sources along with consistently receiving the highest marks for customer satisfaction and service in the state of Ohio as measured by the cms cahps surveys. As an integral part of mount carmel health system, mount carmel health plan is a community-based managed health care organization that works in collaboration with employers, individual members, physicians, health care providers, and community and governmental agencies to continually improve the health of its members by providing exceptional coverage and access to high quality and cost-effective care. Please visit our website for additional information: www.thpmedicare.org/mount-carmel
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 67
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 88.5%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 94.2%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.6%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.88; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.2%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 88.5% of revenue deployed · 94.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $537.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.9M · 21 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $72M reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay and related organizations
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 312 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.