Montgomery County Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
233070457
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Blue Bell, PA, USA
Phone
4845327387
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and Fund Distribution

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,101,432
Expenses
$1,156,606
Assets
$8,354,757
Liabilities
$573,550

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • VIRGINIA FRANTZ (PRESIDENT AND CEO)
  • WILLIAM G TONER (CO-CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • VIRGINIA FRANTZ (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $159,026 total reported compensation
  • WILLIAM G TONER (CO-CEO): $129,808 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To develop, receive, administer and manage, under community control, funds received from public and private sources and distribute them for charitable purposes, primarily to meet local needs.

What it reported doing in 2025

The foundation collects and distributes funds to assist a wide range of community needs that include education, health and human services and cultural groups serving residents of montgomery county. As well as assisting donors to establish permanent endowment funds, the foundation accepts donations of all sizes to address issues in the community. The foundation is a community foundation and has taken on the role of 'a catalyst for community solutions' by convening individuals, agencies and groups to strengthen communities to address those needs.the foundation provides educational programs to staff and board members of non-profits to enhance their capacity. These programs address organizational issues, financial issues and other current topics critical to the operations of non-profit organizations.building strong communities and assisting those most in need is possible only through donations from those who want to make a difference.the foundation supports the non-profit community through grants and as follows: we regularly assist donors in achieving their philanthropic goals by providing education about issues, non-profits, the best options for making a difference in the community.we provide monthly educational programs for non-profit staff and boards assisting them with information about issues they are facing. These programs are provided at no charge and topics include fundraising, accounting, cyber issues, and other important topics.we sponsor your way home, a continuing collaboration with montgomery county, other foundations, non-profit housing agencies, and others to make homelessness rare, brief, and non-recurring. This includes working to change the system that assists people who are homeless or about to be homeless. The new system will lead to successful solutions to the issues and with more permanent and quicker results.during the three-year covid pandemic, we provided the nonprofits with coaches and software to teach their staff how to increase their funding - this was a highly successful public private partnership.during the three-year covid pandemic, we worked with others to raise over $1,000,000 to assist nonprofits continuing to serve those most in need.we funded local research projects in collaboration with other funders to identify community needs. The results of those research projects often result in the undertaking of catalyst for community solutions projects like the human services resource directory. This project was developed and implemented by this foundation to provide current information to those in need of services and is now linked with a call center and online access at www.211sepa.org.the foundation received a grant from atlantic philanthropies for a 4-year period to provide civic engagement support to a program for adults 60+, giving them opportunities to volunteer with local nonprofits using their skills to make an impact.creative montco was a partnership between the foundation, individuals, government, foundations, corporations, and others, to complete a research project to develop a 10-year plan for arts and culture for montgomery county. The project is in implementation phase currently and involved approximately 100 volunteers, indicating tremendous community support.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 63% for direct work, and 37% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.9%; rating input score 91
  • Program expense ratio: 83.4%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $22.67 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 65.7%; rating input score 66; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.22; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 25%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90.9% of revenue deployed · 83.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $965K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $159K · 12 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 14 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 14 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 59/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.