Model Cities Properties
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 364661878
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2015
- Location
- St Paul, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6516328350
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,044,074
- Expenses
- $1,105,245
- Assets
- $8,980,932
- Liabilities
- $7,570,893
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KIZZY DOWNIE (CEO/BOARD SECRETARY)
Highest reported compensation
- KIZZY DOWNIE (CEO/BOARD SECRETARY): $119,955 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To operate for the benefit of model cities of st. Paul, inc. And model cities community development corporation.
What it reported doing in 2025
Model cities properties encompasses all of model cities' real estate development projects. Our most recent development, model cities brownstone, is located at the victoria street light rail transit (lrt) station of st. Paul's green line. The development is a 4-story, mixed-use transit-oriented development that includes 35 units of affordable rental housing; approximately 20,000 square feet of retail, office and community space; and close to 7,000 square feet of outdoor space dedicated to a pocket park. In 2025, 44 individuals (31 households) with low incomes gained access to safe, affordable housing at our brownstone loft apartments. See schedule o for additional information.since opening in 2017, brownstone has been at or near 100 percent occupancy (approximately 94% on average each year) for the 35 units of affordable housing included in the project. The population of residents is diverse with a mix of races, ages, and families residing at brownstone. Interest continues to remain high in the residence as we typically get multiple applications for vacancies when they arise. In addition, model cities is increasing its capacity as a property manager as it has successfully met all the lihtc compliance issues that came with the project. All five commercial suites along university avenue have continued to thrive during their lease. Commercial tenants have been a blend of business owners from the surrounding neighborhood including a somali-owned convenience store/deli, an african american-owned barbershop, an african american women owned event center, a bipoc-owned apparel store, and an african american women-owned restaurant. These shops have employed nearly 20 individuals over the past year, many of whom are residents from the area.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 82% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.4%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 76.3%; rating input score 76
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.26 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 90%; rating input score 90; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -5.9%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.13; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.84; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16.1% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.6% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.4% of revenue deployed · 76.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $843K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $120K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2016 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 7 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.