Miraglo Foundation

What it reported doing in 2025

4a: various - $13,000 was donated to chi or consciusness & healing initiative, a not-for-profit foundation focusing on biofield education and research to writeup a research findings and a funding for a documentary about biofieldhealing.$30,000 was donated to sri narayani hopital (sri sakthi amma healthcaretrust) in tamil nadu, india for the college of nursing studentscholarships.$20,000 was donated to sri sakthi narayani siddar peedam charity to provide meals to community in southern india.$20,000 was donated to feeding america san diego for food assistance tothe needy in san diego community.$1,000 was donated to barbara cummmings from san diego, helping afghanrefugee settlement in san diegowith clothing, food etc.$10,000 was donated to solutions for change, a non for profit 501(c)3organization in vista, California that lifts families and communities outof darkness and into independence with community-focused solutions, fighting against the churn of poverty and homelesssness to transformlives and restore community. The three programs work together toholistically solve the root cause of the challenges families are facing, so future generations can live without the burden of poverty, dependency and instability. Big solutions were in order and with thehelp of other community leaders and entrepreneurs, solutions forchange was born. Their vision was different from the current handoutapproach to homelessness. It did not include more shelter beds, feedingprograms or traditional human services, but rather an innovative, permanent solution focused on well-being and capacity building.solutions for change creates access for parents to the right set ofopportunities, addresses root causes of dependency, and equips peoplewith the skills, knowledge, and resources to permanently solve theirhomelessness. The comprehensive model addresses three key areas: personal development (well-being), workforce development (economiccapacity), and community development (service). It blends affordablehousing, educational opportunities, employment training and healthrelated solutions all within one cohesive strategic partnership.$5,000 was donated to community resource center, or crc, a not-for-profit organization in encinitas, California addressing thehomelessness and food issues in the community. Established in 1979, crchas grown from providing basic needs for families in crisis, to offeringextensive programs that facilitate the safety, stability, and self-sufficiency of low-income and episodically homelesshouseholdsincluding domestic violence (dv) victims. Ccrc works to endhunger, homelessness and domestic violence in north county san diego.as a provider of integrative services, rcs programs include a domesticviolence emergency shelter, hotline and prevention/educationoutreach, a therapeutic childrens center, professional counseling, legal advocacy, food and nutrition distribution center, homelessnessprevention and rental and housing assistance. All of crcs programsare designed to assist participants to successfully navigate their pathsof safety, stability & self-sufficiency.$5,000 was donated to center for community solutions, inc. (ccs), anonprofit501(c)3 organization founded in 1969, in san diego, californiathat is funded through various grants, foundations, and privatecontributions. Funds raised go directly to providing intervention andprevention services to victims of relationship violence and sexualassault. Ccs has served thousands of children last year alone to heal and prevent relationship and sexual violence. Ccs operates theonly rape crisis center in the city of san diego along with a countywide24-hour bilingual crisis helpline. The nonprofit agency also providesemergency domestic violence shelters, hospital and courtaccompaniment, as well as legal and counseling services for thoseaffected by domestic violence, sexual assault and stalking. Ccs alsoworks with local community groups and schools to provide innovativeprevention programs to promote he

Financial Efficiency

• Mission deployment rate: 78.4%; rating input score 78
• Program expense ratio: 89.7%; rating input score 90
• Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

• Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 15th percentile among comparable filings
• Pay-setting controls: Limited
• Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
  • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
  • Requires narrative reports: Fail
  • Conducts field audits: Fail
  • May suspend future funding: Fail
  • Requires financial reports: Fail
  • Conducts site visits: Fail
  • Requires grant agreements: Fail
  • May require repayment: Fail
• Grant itemization coverage: 87.7%; rating input score 88; 41st percentile among comparable filings
• Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
• Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

• Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
• Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
  • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
  • Whistleblower policy: Pass
  • Document-retention policy: Pass
  • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
  • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
  • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
  • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
  • Audit committee oversight: Missing
  • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

• Operating margin: 13.2%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
• Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.36; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
• Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
• Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

• Program expense growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
• Revenue growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
• Asset growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings