Minnesota Community Health Worker Alliance
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 452787308
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- Saint Paul, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6125321303
- Rating
- 93
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,174,041
- Expenses
- $1,222,672
- Assets
- $253,800
- Liabilities
- $136,147
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- ANN NYAKUNDI (EXECUTIVE DI): $39,745 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Minnesota community health worker alliance builds community and systems capacity for better health through the integration of community health worker (chw) strategies. Our vision is equitable and optimal outcomes for all communities. As a catalyst, convener, expert, resource and partner, we advance our mission through education, training, capacity-building and shared learning.
What it reported doing in 2024
2024 program highlights include: mdh community health worker grant in march 2024, the Minnesota community health worker alliance (alliance) launched a five-year Minnesota department of health (mdh) legislative grant to expand and strengthen the community health worker (chw) workforce statewide. Running from march 1, 2024, through february 28, 2029, the grant positions the alliance as mdh's implementation partner to advance health equity by building sustainable chw infrastructure, increasing employer readiness, and improving measurement of chw capacity and impact. Key activities include convening chws, employers, payors, certificate programs, and state partners to develop a statewide chw logic model and multi-year plan; designing and operating a measurement system to track common chw indicators; delivering technical assistance and training to chws and supervisors; strengthening partnerships with chw certificate schools; and operating a resource hub/registry that supports recruitment, data collection, and dissemination. The grant also funds demonstration projects across healthcare, local public health, and community-based settings to document value, such as improved outcomes and cost avoidance tied to chw services. Anticipated outcomes over the grant term include increased chw and employer participation in the registry; improved, regularly reported workforce metrics; expanded employer capacity to hire, supervise, and reimburse chws; and broader geographic reach of chw services to reduce disparities. Mdh provides program oversight and collaborates with the alliance on work planning, quarterly reporting, and annual evaluation to ensure measurable progress toward a resilient, data-driven chw ecosystem serving Minnesota communities. In 2024, the alliance made significant strides in strengthening its organizational capacity and infrastructure. The organization transitioned from contracted roles to permanent staffing by hiring its first employee, with plans for transitioning two more contract workers to staff. In collaboration with the mdh, the alliance contributed to the development of the report titled community health worker initiatives in Minnesota: an environmental scan of the chw field. Additionally, the alliance played a key role in planning the chw section of the american public health association chw section annual meeting, held in minneapolis and hosting a chw summit with 150 chws in october 2024. In 2024, the alliance also launched three flagship programs that strengthened learning, collaboration and chw engagement across Minnesota's chw workforce. The chw learning circle engaged 186 chws in monthly peer- learning sessions on topics from chronic disease prevention to birth equity. The chw supervisor roundtable connected 76 supervisors statewide for quarterly problem-solving and best practice sharing. Meanwhile, the chw education committee convened faculty and community representatives monthly to align and update Minnesota's standardized chw certificate curriculum. Together, these programs fostered professional growth, consistency in training, and a more connected chw community across the state. Hrsa community health worker training program grant the alliance partnered with the Minnesota department of health (mdh) on a federally funded hrsa community health worker (chw) training program grant to expand and strengthen Minnesota's chw workforce. Effective from february 13, 2023, through september 14, 2025, the sub-award supports the recruitment, training, and retention of chw certificate students and apprentices to advance health equity, strengthen the public health workforce, and improve access to preventive and recovery services in underserved communities. Under mdh oversight, the alliance develops and manages the application and acceptance system, provides tuition assistance, sdoh stipends, and chw registry fees, and offers office hours and mentoring related to workforce and career development. The program also coordinates
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 99% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 66% for direct work, and 34% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 97.7%; rating input score 98
- Fundraising efficiency: $80.87 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.1%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.21; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.54; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.3%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 21.3% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 27.2% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 97.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $40K · 16 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $269K reported
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Whistleblower policy not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.