St Catherine University

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
410695509
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
St Paul, MN, USA
Phone
6516906566
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
University or Technological Institute

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$151,635,094
Expenses
$147,993,658
Assets
$379,394,310
Liabilities
$113,090,464

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

42 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • REBECCA K ROLOFF (PRESIDENT (THRU 12/24))
  • MARCHETA EVANS (PRESIDENT (STARTED 7/24))

Highest reported compensation

  • REBECCA K ROLOFF (PRESIDENT (THRU 12/24)): $592,810 total reported compensation
  • MARCHETA EVANS (PRESIDENT (STARTED 7/24)): $253,446 total reported compensation
  • DENISE BAIRD (CO-PROVOST): $230,925 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We educate women to lead and influence. We educate at all degree levels through valuing and integrating the liberal arts and professional education within the catholic intellectual tradition, see schedule oemphasizing scholarly inquiry and social justice teaching as lived by the sisters of st. Joseph of carondelet. We welcome a rich diversity of students, with a baccalaureate college for women at the heart of the university and graduate and adult colleges for women and men. Committed to excellence and opportunity, st. Catherine university develops leaders who act with integrity.

What it reported doing in 2024

St. Catherine university confers degrees at the associate, baccalaureate, master's and doctoral levels. The total 2024-2025 enrollment is 3,659 students: 94.1 percent women and 40.5 percent multicultural or international. St catherine university has a 10:1 student to faculty ratio. St catherine university ranks highly for social mobility, often cited as a top performer in Minnesota for helping students from low-income backgrounds succeed, with a 2024-2025 ranking of #52 among national institutions on social mobility by us news & world report. Nearly one-third of enrolled students are first generation students. St catherine university has had students selected for fullbright awards in multiple consecutive years with the very first recipient occurring in 1953. See schedule oduring the 2024-2025 academic year, st. Catherine university awarded 55 post secondary certificates, 187 associate degrees, 536 baccalaureate degrees, 32 post-baccalaureate certificates, 341 master's degrees, 4 post master's certificates and 87 doctorate degrees. St. Catherine university, also known as st. Kate's, is one of the largest private women's universities in the nation and one of the most culturally diverse campuses in Minnesota. 100% of st. Kate's students involved in collaborative research have been accepted to present at the national conference on undergraduate research (ncur) in the past ten years. In addition, st. Catherine university is the home of the oldest healthcare program in the state of Minnesota.launched in 2013 our 10 week summer scholars program engages student-faculty teams on research and creative projects. Compensation for faculty and students allows teams to focus on scholarship and promotes accessibility for high financial need students. Teams clarify expectations through a mentorship contract, discuss students' career goals, and participate in bi-directional, pre-post skills assessment of student reasearch and faculty mentorship. Community is fostered through social events and weekly professional development workshps on responsible conduct of research and career readiness. Faculty attend weekly mentor workshops to discuss inclusive mentoring and build scholarly community. A closing poster session showcases student research and builds students' sense of self-efficacy and belonging. Post-surveys consistently show that 100% of participants agree that after the program they "see themselves as scholars" when compared to pre-survey levels. Since 2021, collaborative research has supported 17 designated research and creative inquiry (rci)-intensive courses across 12 disciplines to extend research accessibility to the classroom. A total of 639 students have taken an rci course (44% bipoc, 50% pell, 26% first gen). The number of undergraduate research students in the exemplary program was 280 students, including many first and second year students. Notably student researcher demographics align with the diversity of our student body. In the past seven years the retention rate of summer scholars students in the subsequent fall was 100%. Summer scholars from 2018-2024 entering classes had a 100% graduation rate. Dissemination is a hallmark of the summer scholars program. For the past seven years 100% of summer scholars who submitted a proposal were accepted to present at the national confererence on undergraduate research (ncur). With operational funding for student travel, gift funds and foundation and federal grants 28 students were funded to present at ncur in 2024. Many students publish their research in peer-reviewed journals including student authored publications through a national institute of health (nih) r25 grant. This type of grant is designed to support educational activites related to biomedical, behavioral and clinical research

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 86% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 64% for direct work, and 36% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.6%; rating input score 91
  • Program expense ratio: 85.6%; rating input score 86
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7.56 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Fail
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.4%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.56; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.3; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.9%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90.6% of revenue deployed · 85.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 28 of 28 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $126.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $593K · 42 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $21.5M reported
  • Consistency: 44 of 44 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 13 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 12 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 34/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 56/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.