Mercy Amicare Home Healthcare Port Huron

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
383320701
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2016
Forms available
Form 990 2016
Location
Livonia, MI, USA
Phone
7343436570
Rating
71
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Home Health Care

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$87,301
Expenses
$245,561
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ERIN DENHOLM (DIRECTOR; PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • JOHN CAPASSO (DIRECTOR; EVP CONTINUING CARE): $896,908 total reported compensation
  • ERIN DENHOLM (DIRECTOR; PRESIDENT & CEO): $597,977 total reported compensation
  • AGNES HAGERTY (DIR THR 12/16; TRIN GEN CSL THR 6/16): $470,900 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We, trinity home health services and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. Mercy amicare home healthcare, port huron is a member of trinity home health services and trinity health.

What it reported doing in 2016

Since 1997, mercy amicare home healthcare, port huron has brought health care to people in their homes, serving st. Clair, sanilac, and macomb counties, as well as parts of lapeer county. Services included nurse visits, physical, speech and occupational therapy services and iv services. Mercy amicare home healthcare, port huron provided services to all individuals who applied regardless of their ability to pay. Effective july 1, 2016, mercy amicare home healthcare, port huron ceased operations. On june 27, 2017 mercy amicare home healthcare, port huron merged into trinity home health services, a related organization.please visit our website for additional information: www.trinityhealthathome.org/home-care

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 67
  • Accountability: 80
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 91%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 81.8%; rating input score 82; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -181.3%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 145.5%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -36.6% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -10.1% per year; rating input score 0; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -19.2% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 91% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 11 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $223K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $897K · 20 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay and related organizations
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2009 to 2016
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 336 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.