Medical Teams International

What it reported doing in 2024

In fy25 medical teams shipped medical supplies and equipment, ppe and vitamins to the USA, uganda, Georgia, haiti, honduras, kenya, mexico, pakistan, tonga, guatemala, and greece.colombia: in fy25, medical teams continued its programming to address barriers to health through health promotion, integration into the health care system, cash voucher assistance, disease prevention activities, medical screenings and referrals, and subsidized maternal and child health services to venezuelan migrants and colombian returnees in colombia. During fy25, the colombia office continued to work with simon bolvar foundation as well as funding from germany. 916,831 people were served through the health programming in fy25 in colombia.ethiopia: in fy25, medical teams continued its work with refugees and nationals throughout somali, benishangul gumz, tigray, amhara and afar regional states. Medical teams in ethiopia works with health posts and clinics, including those which were damaged during conflict, to reestablish them with medical staff, essential drugs, and community health extension work. Medical team provided assistance to a catchment population of 2,078,043. Despite continued security risks, the program is reaching those most in need while we strive to maintain the safety of the staff and assets. Ethiopia donors in fy25 included un, european, and us funding.sudan: in fy25 medical teams continued its response to the refugee influx from ethiopia and south sudan in addition to internal conflict response. In fy25 medical teams continued its response in white nile and gedaref states supporting primary health and nutrition services for refugee and host communities. Mti started programming in khartoum and al jazirah during fy25. Through services in health clinics and nutrition sites, sudan served a population of 1,020,7964 with the support of un agencies.tanzania: in fy25, medical teams continued operations in western tanzania, providing health and nutrition services in nyarugusu and nduta refugee camps, in the neighbouring communities, in kigoma, and in dar es salam. Medical teams continued as a unhcr health-implementing partner in both camps, providing reproductive healthcare, community outreach, referral services, and nutrition support to vulnerable populations. Medical teams also continued its partnership with the u.s. Department of state to strengthen community health services through support of community health workers, improve outcomes in reproductive health including maternal and child health care, and build capacity and sustainability of local health services through supporting regional hospitals in kigoma, and training clinical staff. Both partners support medical teams in offering emergency and elective medical services through contracted health facilities; they are also funding the non-communicable diseases program. In fy25 medical teams continued to partner with the government of tanzania and collaborated with the unhcr and the other camp actors to facilitate the promotion and safe repatriation of burundian refugees. Finally, medical teams improved access to quality health care in the camps for 211,814 refugees from burundi and democratic republic of congo, and tanzanians who access care in the camps. Uganda: medical teams is implementing emergency and preventative health care programming through targeted relief and development strategies in the northwestern, southwestern, and western regions of uganda. Medical teams is a lead health implementing partner for unhcr in nakivale and oruchinga settlements in southwest uganda, kyangwali, kyaka ii and rwamwanja settlements in midwestern uganda, and in adjumani (12 settlements) and moyo/obongi district (palorinya settlement) districts in west nile. The team in uganda responded to refugee influxes and disease outbreaks. The country office strengthened its risk assessments and awareness and continued to influence the health sector in uganda with active engagement in coordination. Across uga

Financial Efficiency

• Mission deployment rate: 93.5%; rating input score 94
• Program expense ratio: 90.2%; rating input score 90
• Fundraising efficiency: $14.73 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

• Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 31st percentile among comparable filings
• Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
  • Compensation committee: Pass
  • Independent consultant: Missing
  • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
  • Written employment contract: Pass
  • Compensation survey or study: Pass
  • Board or committee approval: Pass
• Foreign activity oversight: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
  • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
  • Requires narrative reports: Fail
  • Conducts field audits: Fail
  • May suspend future funding: Fail
  • Requires financial reports: Fail
  • Conducts site visits: Fail
  • Requires grant agreements: Pass
  • May require repayment: Fail
• Grant itemization coverage: 64.7%; rating input score 65; 13th percentile among comparable filings
• Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
• Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

• Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
• Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
  • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
  • Whistleblower policy: Pass
  • Document-retention policy: Pass
  • CEO compensation review process: Pass
  • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
  • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
  • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
  • Audit committee oversight: Pass
  • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

• Operating margin: -3.5%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
• Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.54; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
• Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.25; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
• Officer compensation ratio: 2.1%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

• Program expense growth: -9.4% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
• Revenue growth: -7.7% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
• Asset growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings